Who killed more iraqi, Bush or Saddam Hussein?

Answer 1

Bush

Answer 2

Actually, some of the naswers are more interesting than the Q. It doesn't only matter who KILLED more. You have to think who STOPPED the lives of more. Then, the answer would definitley be Bush. Now, Iraqi's can't even go to work with more than a 50% probability of coming back. You have no idea what this means or feels. Also, you want to compare fairly?? Think about the future prospects and impacts of both and for how long it will last. How much time would it take to clean up the Bush mess there?? Even Bush himself now have no way out for himsef, not mention for Iraqis.
Just one last comment, if you ever get 'educated' about the culture of those people in Iraq, you would have definitely knew that it's not only people's life that matters, it's the quality and values that this life represents.

Answer 3

Saddam, but Bush is a close second. Now that Saddam is dead, there is a chance that Bush will catch up.

Many people say that Bush hasn't killed anyone. No, not personally, but his actions have been responsible for thousands of deaths. Much like Saddam.

Answer 4

How Many People Has Saddam Hussein Killed?
If you have a strong stomach, read this from The Iraq Foundation. Be educated.

http://www.iraqfoundation.org/news/2003/ajan/27_saddam.html

Answer 5

Do you know anything about the history of Saddam Hussein? You wouldn't ask this obtuse question if you did. Some estimate that Hussein killed 2 million of his own people. The comparison itself is incongruous.

Answer 6

info in his trial reported 60 human beings in a unmarried city and 15 in yet another. Saddam's legal professional claimed the slain were Iranian Guerrillas not Kurds. yet that did not end the media frenzy. My wager ... we are able to in no way understand the truth it truly is blocked by a authorities set of guidelines from all search for engines. Even the transcript is assessed.

Answer 7

You are missing someone in your list, and that's President Clinton. We should not forget that the Clinton Administration bombed Iraq heavily for all eight of his years in office. At the same time, there were harsh economic sanctions aimed at effectively starving the people into overthrowing Saddam.

So, we need to add Clinton to the list, unfortunately. All three are proven killers. All three probably had political alternatives to pursuing the path of mass death.

Answer 8

Your question has no merit. The fact you mention both names in the same breath paints a very clear picture of your view and mentality. The numbered dead in Iraq , pre 2001 vary from 400,000 to 850,000. And as far as the people dying in Iraq go, they are being killed by their own regional citizens. Scumbags drifting in over the borders of Syria, Lebanon, Iran and Jordan to name but a few. So, in direct answer to your "question", my answer is that Saddam killed more. More by 101 %.

People die in wars, it's a fact of war. It isn't pretty or nice, but then real life rarely is pretty or nice. Iraq is an important stepping stone to the foundation that will lead to the fall of radical Islam's goal of wiping out Israel and all the rest of western society. For my money, it's a pretty good tradeoff.

Answer 9

Bush hasn't killed a single Iraqi, the United States has. On the other hand, it is estimated SH had more than one-quarter million people murdered.

Wake up, idiots...

Answer 10

The Iraq health ministry finds the insurgency has been responsible for 150,000 deaths of Iraqis.