Granted, the USA was out to get Saddam because they felt "national security" was at threat by Iraqs "Ghost Nuclear Weapons of mass destruction".
If so, why did they not apologise and reinstate him when they were wrong?
They bleat on about his war-crimes now, but we all know that the US has killed more people the world over than anyone else without their leaders getting executed... what makes Saddam any different?
2006-12-30 00:09:48 · 5 answers · asked by Darkspark88 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
killing during war time and killing for fun are two different things in the laws of earth
2006-12-30 00:14:03 · answer #1 · answered by Greeneyed 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have been getting your info from CBS & CNN news. I have contacts with people that have been & are serving in Iraq. But anyway, your going to listen to and believe what your predesposed to. What you & your liberal comrads are so upset about this morning is the hanging of Saddam being seen as a victory for the Bush administration. Your putting your political views above what is right for Irag the U.S. and the world for that matter. Wake up & really start trying to inform yourself with the truth.
2006-12-30 08:14:11 · answer #2 · answered by GJfromfla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
G W Bush already said to Saddam. "Saddam, I will apologize to you for invading Iraq. But first, you must apologize to my Dad for trying to kill him". Saddam never did.
2007-01-01 13:04:44 · answer #3 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What planet are you living on. Saddam was executed for killing his OWN PEOPLE. It was not for WMD'S or any other reason. Wake up to yourself.
2006-12-30 08:14:46 · answer #4 · answered by narcissus 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i don't think he's entitled to an apology. I believe he had then and gave them to Iran before we invaded his country.
2006-12-30 08:14:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋