If Saddam was killed for killing people of Iraq how could the occupation forces kill Iraqies?

Question

The rate of killing by US forces is much more than that of Saddam

Answer 1

Saddam's killing is a political killing being done USA and UK. There is NO question of justice. If one talks of justice then Bush should have been hanged before Saddam.

Answer 2

watching the different previous solutions jogs my memory that people who shout loudest have the least to assert and the main to conceal. The Iraqis that Saddam killed have been in lots of cases killed with the conivance and appoval of england and usa, not that Britain has had an autonomous voice for years, and we killed many with the sanctions we imposed on Iraq, which the politicians knew and specific was hoping may be the case, so they'd portray what were their murderous tyrant as now an autonomous murderous tyrant. try looking in the back of the headlines, a number of you.

Answer 3

The US forces are only targeting terrorists who are murdering Iraqis, so US forces are actually saving Iraqis.You are lying when you say US forces are killing more Iraqis than Saddam did. Most Iraqis that are killed are being killed by other Iraqis and foreign muslim terrorists who have come to Iraq to murder people for their pagan moon god allah.

Answer 4

The occupation forces are killing for oil. Their intention was never to go after Saddam unless he didn't give in to Bush's demands. For years nobody cared about Saddam until Bush came into office, then he finished the war his father had started. Removing Saddam was essential for control of the region.

Answer 5

Yet another ill informed question by an uninformed person. BEFORE you make your claims...and that is all they are...why don't you please site not less that 3 different sources to support your claims?

Specific number (give or or take 1,000) of Iraqis that Saddam and his regime murdered/killed/butcher; take your pick.

Cite the rate that you claim US forces are killing Iraqis compared to the rate that Saddam was killing Iraqis (HIS OWN PEOPLE)

A side note...Saddam was not killed; he was executed under Iraqi Law...unless of course you are a Saddam loyalist?

Also...more Iraqi civilians have been killed by other Iraqis and insurgents by US troops. And please do not cite that abused, unsubstantiated and never proved BS "claim" that 650,000 Iraqi citizens have died due to the actions of the US military...unless of course you can be the VERY 1st to provide indisputable multiple source and absolute proof.

Oh...and finally if I may point out your apparent lack of your ability or willingness to checkout even one fact in your question.....

The is NO SUCH WORD as Iraqies. The correct spelling is Iraqis. If you can't even check the most basic information in your question why should anyone believe a word you "claim". My heaven's you even have spell checking available and can't take a second to use it?

I look forward to the sources to support your dubious claims.....soon.

Answer 6

Before the occupation there was a war... I hope you aren't thinking that the dead from that part of history is criminal.

Since the war, the US and other participants of the occupation forces in Iraq have been clearing out pockets of resistance, the leftovers of the war who refuse to accept defeat. The US has been policing the country for terrorists and keeping order while the new Iraqi government takes shape and grows able to police itself.. Do these activities sound unworthy of our military?

As for losses, our losses are not as great as the radicals losses because we care about the lives of our soldiers enough to keep them well trained, well armed, well equipped and carefully deployed; additionally, we care about the innocent Iraqi civilians.

Do you think there is an equally prudent practice and philosophy being expressed by the insurgent resistance forces? I don't.

[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.

Answer 7

I would say the difference is that Saddam murdered people in purpose, while Americans mostly try to avoid killing innocent people. There were also Americans on trial for not following this in Iraq.

Answer 8

it has been established that saddam had more than 150,000 people killed & not just a few, & you are like many others, You forgot, 9/11 when 3000 people lost their lives, & none of them deserved to die, they had families, & now because The United States are defending itself, The world cries wolf on the USA, Hey we were minding our own business,& now they have woke up a Giant nation, & the world calls foul play, You ought to thank God that we have not used all our military might, because there would have been no Iraq left by now. And how it surprised the iraq's & the world how we can put a missle through their front door at over 200 miles away.

Answer 9

When grown men hide behind women and children or inside churches and shrines, some civilians will get killed.We have killed less civilians than their own people have, because they way a different kind of hat. (Similar to our own Civil War.) We are fighting a society that believes 'my way or no way', the rules of engagement are fluid rather than fixed, and there are now other rules. I have yet to see any Muslim conflict that has ever ended. Some have been killing each other for hundred of years, there seems to be no idea of 'compromise'.

Answer 10

During Saddam's regimen he was responsible for close to half a million deaths. He sponsored rape rooms. Burned people alive. Threw them off building. Starved them to death. Killed thousands with poison gas. It goes on and on. You are terribly wrong with comparing Saddam with our troops.