2006-12-29 22:19:12 · 16 answers · asked by Socinian F 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, Jesus was immaculately conceived. Evolution started with a bang ;)
Evolution is as much of a religion as Christianity and has no place in the science classroom. It is a theory, not a fact and sadly it is being promoted as science.
The ones promoting this have an anti god agenda and seem to think it's ok to block students from hearing any concepts about possible intelligent design, whilst they push the evolution theory that has yet to provide substantial proof it ever took place.
Their arguments never cease, but they must persist to keep the faith. Get yourself educated on what is really going on out there with the evolution agenda. In actual fact, they will have you believe that Christianity is dying and evolution is growing. Interestingly enough, there is a growing number of science/evoltuion teachers becoming increasingly alarmed at students questioning the theory of evolution in the classroom as they are at long last beginning to hear the other side and would you believe it? They are daring to question the godlike status of a science teacher.
There are a few books that are exposing evolution for the lies - a few are "Lies in the Textbooks" by Kent Hovind. And "Refuting Evolution" by Jonathan Sarfati.
I would encourage anybody, student or otherwise to check these books out and find out what the evolutionist/scientist does NOT want you to know.
2006-12-29 22:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by Gus 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, the study of evolution does not involve experimentation. The Bible, however, certainly contains many stories from ancient myths. You will find the virgin birth, the creation story, the flood, and the trinity in the myths in many ancient cultures. They all predate the Bible. It is obvious that you know nothing about evolution.
2006-12-29 22:37:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
this may well be a real concern---it is not attainable for all and sundry immediately to in my opinion redo each and all of the experiments and observations that form the inspiration of our scientific know-how of the worldwide. the different experiments are so costly that they are able to't be redone via all and sundry, much less an involved beginner. So, a scientifically-minded individual would desire to have faith different scientists, a minimum of to a pair quantity. this may well be a weak point interior the scientific technique---it facilitates an out: "I do exactly not have faith those human beings!" that's exploited via creationists---if scientists may well be slandered as untrustworthy, badly inspired, or perhaps truthfully evil, then the completed scientific employer may well be mentioned as into question.
2016-10-19 05:10:15 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like it or not. Social Darwinism influenced Christianity tremendously. Survival of the fittest ? Christianity see themselves as the end product with their so -called theological imperialism.
2006-12-29 22:38:30 · answer #4 · answered by what it is 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your ignorance is overwhelming. How about reading Richard Dawkins and Stephen J. Gould before you talk about evolution?
2006-12-29 22:22:14 · answer #5 · answered by joanmazza 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Many microbes, and some larger creatures reproduce asexually. They been doing it for longer than Christianity. Big deal. What's your point?
2006-12-29 23:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not one part of your question makes any sense whatsoever.
Evolutionists do not give a fig about religion as it pertains to evolution. Only the religious care about evolution as it pertains to religion because it contradicts the story of creation.
2006-12-29 22:20:34 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋
i was born of a virgin. she just had stopped being one shortly before i was conceived.
2006-12-29 22:29:09 · answer #8 · answered by Shawn M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Now where did you get that from? That's an unfounded statement and it doesn't make sense at all.
2006-12-29 22:40:55 · answer #9 · answered by T Delfino 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Do they really think that artificial insemination is the same?
2006-12-29 22:22:53 · answer #10 · answered by mikerow992003 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋