Depends, if it's a torrid start based on passion, yeah I would.
If I grew to know her and love her first as a friend, heck no, I'm holding on for dear life.
2006-12-29 22:12:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes I do. If you love someone then you want what is best for them. For example if your boyfriend got a place at a top university to study something and this had been his lifelong dream but it meant moving far away you should not object or pose an obstacle because if you were meant to be then the relationship would not suffer as a result of the move. If a person doesn't follow their heart or their dreams they can store up anger and resentment which appears later down the line. It is really hard not to be selfish when you love someone but real love is allowing the person you love to be themselves, follow their dreams and be who they need to be.
2006-12-30 06:20:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, if I loved someone I would want to be with them as much as possible. I mean there are probably circumstances where it would be better if you seperated, I can't think of any right now, but there are always exceptions to rules.
Yes, I believe in soulmates though, so I would say if this person really needed to have space let them go and if they come back to you then you know that fate wants you to be together.
2006-12-30 06:17:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kelly 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's dangerous, but it can be done
It just depends what you want from it. From personal experience i managed to get the guy back, and now we're even stronger than ever, but depending on how close you and your partner depends on the results.
Sometimes you have to let go of someone because you think they're simply better off without you, but if they ask for you back, then maybe you are meant to be together.
I don't know, i have mixed feelings, i was lucky mine went to plan, buts it not something i reccommend to everyone.
2006-12-30 07:24:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It happened to me recently - I feel in love with them and unfortunately they did not with me.
I had to let them go. It really hurt at the time - big time. But I know deep down it was for the best because I could not get the love from them.
I dont know why life is not easy!
2006-12-30 07:59:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by lucas1 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe in this saying because everything in life happens for a reason. So if you're ever in doubt, let the person go and if you are meant to be together, it will happen.
2006-12-30 07:12:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by The Dude 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sometimes the person you love is not in love with you. If you really want them to be happy, then you let them go.
2006-12-30 06:13:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i believe that if you love somebody you have to let him go if he doesn't love you anymore. Love must be shared by two person and not by one so if u love somebody set him free i know that it hurts so much and not that easy but if he comes back set him on fire.. well after you suffered he'll be back just like that...no way..(just kidding) happy New Year:)
2006-12-30 06:50:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by anne 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because there is no need to hold the person on u if he soent want
they say : if u love a person let them go and if they truly love u they will come back to u .... so it shows that there is holding on but the freedom for anybody to be with someone cause he/she wants to !
2006-12-30 06:19:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by athina68 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i totally believe that in jan i got offered job in italy been with bf 6months loved him but new i had to let him go hed moved frm his om town to be with me he had no mates we had no money i cudnt keep house on so i went and i came back 4months later and hes got a baby a fiancee and he happy and im happy i get my life back we wernt ment to be or hed off nerver let me go
2006-12-30 09:00:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by crazygirl3k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋