English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We can either deal with the illegal immigration problem now as described on the books or we will certainly deal with open civil war in the very near future. The American people better decide right now which it will be, because time is running out for Congress to be able to fix the problem. Once that happens, we won't have to worry about civil war in Iraq, it will happen right here in the United States.

The American people need to understand that the United States is under attack! No, not by Iraq or Iran, but by Mexico!...The Mexican government is deliberately and systematically working to destabilize and undermine the very fabric and framework of American society.

2006-12-29 16:26:34 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

FORGET ABOUT CIVIL WAR IN IRAQ, ONE IS COMING TO AMERICA

NewsWithViews.com
While American troops are hunkered down in "safe zones" in Iraq trying to stay out of an escalating civil war, our government seems oblivious to a growing threat of civil war right here in the United States. As anyone can see, millions of illegal aliens living here are becoming more vocal, more demonstrative, more belligerent, and more violence-prone by the day. Unless our government takes deliberate and significant action immediately, America could be in for serious civil unrest real soon.
It is absolutely incredible that our government would tolerate people who are not even legal residents of our country to generate the kind of mass demonstrations and protests that we are witnessing on a daily basis! It is more than incredible; it is outrageous!

2006-12-29 16:32:50 · update #1

On Verge of Civil War

Article in the LA times this year.

Thanks to President Bush, the Los Angeles Times, the Ford Foundation, the Catholic Church, Citicorp, Sears, The Southern Poverty Law Center, the Anti-Defamation League and a variety of other groups and individuals, the United States of America is on the verge of a civil war.
The House of Representatives will never agree to an amnesty bill. (Watch Meet the Press video below). And, millions of militant illegal aliens will not stop protesting until they get it.
As we have warned for years, we are going to have a war with Mexico. And Mexico will be supported by other anti-American invaders.

2006-12-29 16:34:54 · update #2

California is the Dim Picture of America's Future

The Golden State Today Bodes Ill for the U.S. of Tomorrow

SANTA BARBARA—October 5, 2006—As America prepares to surge past a population of 300 million people sometime around October 15, one need only to look at what has happened to California over the past two decades to see what is in store for the rest of the nation.

“Three hundred million people is neither an achievement nor an endpoint, but just a landmark on the way to a billion people,” said Diana Hull, President of Californians for Population Stabilization. “It is time to remind everyone again, that perpetual growth is the philosophy of a cancer cell.”

2006-12-29 16:40:02 · update #3

Question: Why are the malignant narcissism ignoring the facts of the issue? why do the pro-law-breaking among us ignore that our nation is headed towards disaster?

2006-12-29 16:42:41 · update #4

The Problem:
Too Many People

Californians know what’s happening to our state because we’re forced to face the worsening consequences on a daily basis: impossible traffic, unbreathable air, endless urban sprawl, badly overcrowded schools, a dangerously depleted health care system, loss of open space and habitat, depressed wages, heavier taxpayer burdens, and more.

All of these problems have two things in common:
they are robbing us of the quality of life for which we work so hard and they all have the same cause:
too many people.

Too many people and too few resources. America's open-door policies have left California, and the nation, with a continued and unsustainable flood of immigration. And something must be done.

2006-12-29 16:43:45 · update #5

READ THE INFORMATION FIRST BEFORE YOU ANSWER, YOUR IGNORANCE IS SHOWING.

2006-12-29 16:46:10 · update #6

Presidente Fox, stopped just short of making that threat! It seems that he and those who want no form of U.S. Imigration Laws do not agree with how America decided to protect ITSELF along the porous border between Mexico and the USA. Hmm? And here I thought we had that right? Guess not.

Mexico is afraid of losing the 24 some odd billion, yes, that was with a "B" worth of US DOLLARS sent back to THEIR economy by illegal aliens. Yet, they don't do anything to help stop the murders, rapists, thugs, drugs and losers from crossing. Sure, there are mostrly hard workers, simply trying to improve the lives of their families and theirs. Though, there are millions that cross each year, maybe 90% are good, hard working people. Yet, that 10%, that equals HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS, yes, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS murders, killers, rapists and other low lifes, who crfoss in and amongst them!

2006-12-29 16:48:34 · update #7

Mexico Vows to Block Border-Wall Extension
By MARK STEVENSON, Associated Press Writer

MEXICO CITY - The Mexican government, angered by a U.S. proposal to extend a wall along the border to keep out migrants, pledged Tuesday to block the plan and organize an international campaign against it.

Facing a growing tide of anti-immigrant sentiment north of the border, the government has taken out ads urging Mexican workers to denounce rights violations in the United States. It also is hiring an American public relations firm to improve its image and counter growing U.S. concerns about immigration.

Mexican President Vicente Fox denounced the U.S. measures, passed by the House of Representatives Friday, as "shameful." His foreign secretary, Luis Ernesto Derbez, echoed his complaints on Tuesday.

2006-12-29 16:50:07 · update #8

Mexico acknowledges poor treatment of migrants in its own territory

By Mark Stevenson
ASSOCIATED PRESS

7:33 p.m. December 21, 2005

MEXICO CITY – Mexico's federal Human Rights Commission acknowledged on Wednesday that the country uses some of the same methods in dealing with illegal migrants that it has criticized the United States for employing.

The admission comes as Mexican Foreign Relations Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez called on Latin American countries to unite against a U.S. House of Representatives bill to toughen border enforcement.

The bill, which passed on Friday with a 239-182 vote, would make illegal entry a felony, and enlist military and local police to help stop illegal entrants.

But officials of Mexico's federal Human Rights Commission acknowledged that Mexico already employs both tactics in its own territory.

"As a matter of fact, (Mexico's) population law does include prison terms for illegally entering the country ...

2006-12-29 16:51:16 · update #9

THE BLAME GAME
For years now, anti-Americanism has served as a means of last resort by which failed political systems and movements in the Middle East try to improve their standing. The United States is blamed for much that is bad in the Arab world, and it is used as an excuse for political and social oppression and economic stagnation. By assigning responsibility for their own shortcomings to Washington, Arab leaders distract their subjects' attention from the internal weaknesses that are their real problems. And thus rather than pushing for greater privatization, equality for women, democracy, civil society, freedom of speech, due process of law, or other similar developments sorely needed in the Arab world, the public focuses instead on hating the United States.

2006-12-29 16:53:05 · update #10

Common Icons of the Left and the Neo-Nazis
"If one were to list the major icons that defined the core of what it means to be left-wing these days, to be a progressive, there is no doubt that an active antipathy toward Israel and the United States would be on this list. Most likely both enmities would hover around the top of the list rather than its bottom. The sad fact is that a dislike of and disdain for Israel and the United States have become as essential to being a progressive as are income redistribution, the defense of workers' rights, the protection of the environment, and feminism. Tellingly, virtually none of the other items on this list would appear - almost by definition - on an equivalent list that defines what it means to be a rightist in contemporary Europe. However, antipathies toward the United States and Israel - and openly against Jews - would surely also assume pride of place on that list.

2006-12-29 16:54:04 · update #11

Latino group threatening U.S.?
Caller to radio talk show: Pay Mexico for Southwest – or else

Posted: September 11, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern

By Jon Dougherty
© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
A caller to a West Coast talk show who claimed membership in a militant Latino group says the U.S. must acknowledge much of the Southwest belongs to Mexico and pay the proper amount for it – or else.
The caller, who identified himself only as "Louis," made his remarks on KSFO's Barbara Simpson show, which is broadcast in San Francisco, Aug. 31. According to Simpson, the man claimed he was from Los Angeles.

2006-12-29 16:56:18 · update #12

Bustamante tied to student racist group
Former MEChA member now wants to be California governor

Posted: August 29, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
Republican Sen. Trent Lott of Mississippi was forced to step down from his position as majority leader earlier this year after he made supportive comments about Sen. Strom Thurmond's 1948 presidential bid on a segregationist ticket. Democrats have tried to make an issue out of the fact that California Republican gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger's father was a member of the Nazi Party.

2006-12-29 16:56:53 · update #13

Bustamante won't renounce 'racist' group
Chicano student movement seeks to reclaim U.S. Southwest

Posted: August 29, 2003
6:57 p.m. Eastern


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com
California Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante refused today to disassociate himself from a Hispanic group critics say is as racist as the Ku Klux Klan.

Students who belong to the Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan, or MEChA, "are just like the students when I was there, pretty much they are trying to get an education," he told reporters.
"I think the actuality of what takes place in those organizations is to provide student leadership. For me, and many, many others, we were running for student government. That's how I got here today," Bustamante said.

2006-12-29 16:57:42 · update #14

Critics also note members of the predecessor organization to MEChA, the Raza Unida Party, or RUP, met in Lebanon in 1980 with Palestine Liberation Organization Chairman Yasser Arafat, leading some today to question whether the current leadership still has terrorist ties.

2006-12-29 16:58:04 · update #15

Influx Of Mexican Migrants Crippling American Culture, Says Pat Buchanan

Harry Mount, Telegraph (UK), August 22, 2006
[Also see Mr. Buchanan interviewed on the Third World invasion and his VDare column from Monday, Powell, Raspail: Prophets Without Honor?]
America is going the way of the Roman Empire and will be extinguished by illegal immigration, Patrick Buchanan, the Right-wing firebrand, writes in a new book.
In State of Emergency—The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America, the provocative Mr Buchanan jabs at one of America’s raw nerves—the influx of Latin American immigrants across the Mexican border.
Latest estimated figures put the number of illegal immigrants at 11 million, compared to 8.5 million in 2000.
The former Republican presidential adviser calls for a deportation programme and a new Berlin Wall along America’s Mexican border.

2006-12-29 16:58:56 · update #16

Documenting the Decline
What’s happening to California.
reviewed by Thomas Jackson
William Clark is one of those rare scholars able to look at decades of Third-World immigration without being hypnotized by slogans about diversity or terrified by imagined charges of “racism.” Prof. Clark, who teaches in the geography department at the University of California at Los Angeles, has managed to frame the immigration question with a clarity that almost never disturbs the fog that has settled upon our universities: “[T]he principal issue confronting California today is whether this polyglot society can work.” Although Prof. Clark refrains from taking a position either way, his careful, scholarly account of how California is changing leaves little doubt about how this question should be answered.

2006-12-29 17:00:57 · update #17

Balkanization
Needless to say, the former residents of the area didn’t like it when it turned into Granjenal. They have moved out, just as they have moved out of thousands of other neighborhoods that turned into Third-World outposts. “[T]he very large numbers of Hispanics may be stimulating a resegregation,” notes Prof. Clark, adding that “it is possible that the process could usher in an era of separation and balkanization.” He even hints that race may have something to do with it: “the ‘white’ immigrants did eventually merge and blend. The current immigration process, however, may not play out in quite the same way.”

2006-12-29 17:01:45 · update #18

Paris Burns, The Second Leftist Utopia Burns With It

Lexington Green
The current intifada in France has stripped the American Left of its second Utopia in a generation.
The Left lost its earlier worldly utopia when the Soviet Union fell apart. 1989 was not only the year that the countries of Central Europe regained their independence, it was also the year that the Left began to lose its organizing principle, its focus, and to begin casting around for a new organizing principle. The Soviet Union had been the focus of ardent loyalty amongst many American Leftists in the 1930s and for some up to the 1950s. After that the Soviet Union, whatever its defects, was seen as the supporter of progressive forces – and Leftist poster-children -- of the day, like Mao, Castro, Che Guevara, the Viet Cong or the Sandinistas. Even into the 1980s there were many Leftists in the West who could come up with good things to say about the Soviet Union.

2006-12-29 17:03:16 · update #19

34 answers

Many people have their heads in the ground about this topic as well as others (a lot of them are liberals btw). They don't see that the Illegals crossing into this country as an invasion. Yes, I do agree that many illegals are fleeing conditions that are harsh, that does not make it right. However, the money they make here is sent back to Mexico for the most part, except for what they need to live on. The Mexican government does have a booklet on how to cross into the US illegally. The illegals are placing a huge burden on the social services system of this country. They get services for free that citizens cannot get for free without going a lot of paperwork and they get it easier. When non-citizens demand these benefits, fly their country's flag above the flag of the country they are supposedly immigrating to, and refuse to learn the language, the customs, or to enter legally and work to become a citizen, then there is a major problem. It does not matter if the illegal comes from Mexico, China, Vietnam, Brazil, Iran, or some other place, if they are here illegally, they are part of the invasion and need to be captured and deported.

2006-12-29 16:45:01 · answer #1 · answered by msfyrebyrd 4 · 7 3

I dunno about most people answering this question but I actually bothered reading the additional details (and yes, since you were wondering, I feel dumber for having done so) and this is what I noticed:
A whole lotta opinion and unsupported facts. A lot of noise, hoopla, isolated incidents and wanton emotional ranting which does NOT add up to anything substantially factual. For instance; "millions" of illegal immigrants? What, is there a separate population census counting up all these "illegal" immigrants? Where are you getting this number? "more belligerent" and "more vocal"? Excuse me, how exactly do you measure "belligerence"? All your articles on racist quotes from certain individuals (including a phone call which may well have been a prank)? Hardly a representation of all, or even most, immigrants, legal or otherwise. Articles like these are meant to stir us up and goad those of us who are agitated but too irrational to realize we have no good reason to be into action with semantically emotionally charged words (militant, incredible, outrageous, immediately) but they have no logical content or value whatsoever. Logical fallacies abound: "Why are the malignant narcissism ignoring the facts of the issue? why do the pro-law-breaking among us ignore that our nation is headed towards disaster?" Only law-breakers ignore this? Do all law-breakers ignore this? This is not proven, so it's an illogical question.
Anyways, do some research, give me some conclusive evidence, and I'll give you the time of day.

2007-01-02 02:45:44 · answer #2 · answered by JudasHero 5 · 0 0

There won't be a civil war. The invasion is going to be a silent cultural takeover. We have already made accommodations to the culture in or public services, packaging of products in their language etc. etc. etc. We will just keep surrendering a little more each day until we wake up one day in Mexico.

2006-12-29 17:24:42 · answer #3 · answered by papaz71 4 · 3 2

Ola Amigo, before you preach. Go the Vietnam War Memorial first. Look at all the names. Count how many are hispanic last-names. Look at the list of the 3,000 soldiers who died in Iraq. Count how many are hispanic last-names. Those are the ones who gave their life for your freedom. The same freedom that you're enjoying now in mouthing your garbage and self-righteousness.
And about yourself, what have you done for this country??.

2007-01-01 09:51:29 · answer #4 · answered by roadwarrior 4 · 2 3

I agree something needs to be done ASAP. But we live in a PC world. And rounding them all up and shiping them back wont work in the USA. There would be to many people in the USA crying injustice.

2006-12-31 06:41:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think you are 100% correct except for one thing. We are currently under attack from Mexico which means we are at war. We have been invaded. Sure the illegal immigrants from Mexico believe they are coming here to make a better life for themselves, but really their government encourages them to come here and take over by outnumbering Americans.

2006-12-29 17:16:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

I agree completely and so do 90% of America, at least. But politicans on both sides of the fence are too scared to take a strong stand against it. Terrorism the biggest threat? Please--we are being invaded by a foreign country as we speak...meanwhle the politicians live in their gate communities far away from the crime, disease and economic discomfort that the illegal immigrants are causing our country. I reccomend reading Pat Buchannan's State of Emergency...he lays it all out better than I can. You know things are going bad if a liberal is reading a book by Buchannan :o).

2006-12-29 16:34:38 · answer #7 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 7 5

You have a point. It is time that America secures it's borders. Immigration will always be part of this great country, but uncontrolled immigration is dangerous and downright reckless!

2006-12-29 16:45:57 · answer #8 · answered by yearning 2 b free 1 · 7 2

I keep wondering the same thing. I have gone so far as to arm myself in my home, Brown Dawn is a coming , wait till AMERICAN blood is spilled on AMERICAN soil, it is going to blow

2006-12-30 06:24:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

No...no you are not insane...you have nailed it.

Yes, we are invaded and we will (as promised by the leaders of La Raza) see blood running in the streets of America. It won't just be Gringo or American blood...it will be illegal blood as well.

So, we are getting prepared to protect our families, our homes and our nation...

2006-12-29 16:58:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 9 2

fedest.com, questions and answers