Would britain also pull troops out of iraq?
2006-12-29 11:53:14 · 13 answers · asked by supun l 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
What does President Bush have to do with the British Military?
2006-12-29 11:56:36 · answer #1 · answered by Bill 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No - it would make no difference.
The British people do not make decisions on emotional claptrap like this.
Prince Harry joined the Marines by choice. His Uncle, Prince Andrew, served in the Falklands. His Grandfather, the Duke of Edinburgh, fought with the allies during WW2.
There is a long history of members of the ritish Royal family serving in the military.
If, God forbid, Prince Harry should be killed or injured, it would not make one jot of difference to the way we viewed President Bush or the war on terror.
The British people are not so emotional to be influenced by such things.
PS to Johnboy - if you really think the British envy you - I can only assume you have never visited Britain. We have no reason to be envious of America or any other country.
2006-12-29 12:03:57 · answer #2 · answered by Ak23566 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The British people already hate George Bush and the war in Iraq.
2006-12-29 12:05:58 · answer #3 · answered by ROBERT L O 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This war started BEFORE Prince Harry chose to involve himself in the military. Why would his death be pinned on President Bush?
Also, there are many people who already hate the U.S. President.
Britain will pull out of Iraq when they feel their need there has been fulfilled (support troops, etc.).
2006-12-29 12:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by Ambassador Z 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The British made their own decision to place troops in Iraq. If Harry goes there and gets killed it is the British government's fault.
2006-12-29 12:03:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think they dont already hate bush, the war in iraq, etc. generally anything that has to do with the United States.
2006-12-29 12:28:39 · answer #6 · answered by ? 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's funny, Prince Harry won't be going to Iraq! Why would they send the heir to their throne to war? He'll have a comfy seat somewhere nice!
2006-12-29 19:15:58 · answer #7 · answered by Sunshine Swirl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't the British already already hate Bush like the rest of the world does?
2006-12-29 12:02:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Please contain the administration of bill Clinton in that lie, as Maddie Albright accused Saddam of having weapons of mass destruction for some years in the past Bush took workplace, alongside with just about all of his foreign places coverage advisers. The case against Truman grow to be valid, as Japan had tried to provide up, even to Russia, yet Truman had no portion of it, and desperate to drop the bomb. Japan wanted to have one condition, that grow to be to maintain the emperor, and the U. S. refused to permit any circumstances, which they did besides after the bomb had proved efficient. Myna: greater effective study up on actual background, as Truman did no longer could desire to drop the a-bomb, like I stated, Japan had tried fairly some situations to provide up in simple terms before using the bomb, and incredibly did no longer care what number American lives have been lost. occasion, in the time of the korean conflict, he refused to enable MacArthur shoot around the thirty 8th parallel to shelter our troops, and at last fired him. no longer the movements of a guy that cares appropriate to the U. S. troops.
2016-10-28 16:30:23 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh probably but why are you thinking this way? I mean you are having him killed in war before he even got there- not cool. Besides I'm sure that he would be in a place where he'd be pretty safe.
2006-12-29 12:35:46 · answer #10 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋