We entered Iraq on the basis of two lies-1)Weapons of Mass Destruction, 2)Chemical Agents-If The execution of Saddam Hussein is allowed we will be making a big mistake on the part of The U.S. because he was captured through deception. Only by President Bush stating that there were "Weapons of Mass destruction & Chemical agents" did the U.S. go into Iraq and for that specific purpose only. If the Police were to enter a persons house here in the U.S. and arrested the individual on PROBABLE CAUSE; and those evidences were later found to be inadmissable; then this suspect would be considered "unlawfully detained" and released-as should President Hussein! But CHRISTIANS being the majority here in America will see this through-and do not try to convince me that the courts in Iraq were fair and that Saddam was tried by his peers-he was tried by those who would become puppets to Their New Dictator George Bush! OH NO? Then let Iraq VOTE 4 U.S. occupancy! U KNOW they would vote O-U-T!
2006-12-29 07:48:40 · 4 answers · asked by YippyYahQQ 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
the flaw in your theory is that you ignore the fact that Saddam was not convicted and sentenced based on WMDs/Chemical agents. he was convicted and sentenced for WAR CRIMES and Murder.
If you are arrested on suspicion of making Crystal Meth, and while searching your home, no Sudafed or cleaning products are found, but shallow grave in the back yard with your kid's bodies in it its found guess what, just because you didn't have any Meth left you can still be tried for killing your kids.
2006-12-29 08:02:35 · answer #1 · answered by janssen411 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Janssen411's answer is exactly right! How stupid are you really? You can not really be as ignorant to the truth as your question makes you sound. For starters, I completely agree with you the President Bush is a total idiot who went into Iraq through deception, and didn't find weapons of mass destruction or chemical agents or anything he said he would! Most all of us here in America think Bush is a horrible president, that's a given.
Come on though, it's not like Saddam was executed for no reason! He was a horrible, evil person who killed thousands upon thousands of people! Even if he kept Iraq fairly stable, he still murdered countless numbers of his own people! He committed war crimes, and he was executed for committing war crimes! It's not like he was just some nice guy who was executed for no reason! You have to be intelligent enough to realize that!
I'll be the first to say that I don't like President Bush, but are you so anti-Bush that you're willing to side up and sympathize with Saddam Hussein! Bush might have his many faults, but Saddam was definitely much worse, that's obvious, and if you can't see that, then I believe there's something seriously wrong with you!
2006-12-30 01:38:37 · answer #2 · answered by DustInCarroll 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Given the undeniable fact that George W. Bush have been “The President of the united states” for long sufficient to have had a sprint one (approximately 9 months) with the aid of 9/11/01 – and longer – plenty longer than that, with the aid of the time we invaded Iraq, “invoice” became / is an irrelevant participant interior the “interest” we want to call “American Politics”, with the aid of that element.
2016-11-24 23:28:13 · answer #3 · answered by immanuel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
handling bushisist, l humanity, bush and Co, does not leave not grown this hanging not to the death penalty. moreover one fault compared to the calendar of the festival of l'a-id. once more, small victory of the USA proposing the safeguard of the guilty world only us history 300 years (Irak more history against 6 000 years
2006-12-30 06:21:39 · answer #4 · answered by merlin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋