English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what do you think?
Bush and his criminal army has killed more people in 3 years than Saddam in 30 years!!
Is that all right?

2006-12-29 07:42:31 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

24 answers

your an idiot. stop using bush as a scape goat on everything, he is just a human being. People would be on his back if we didn't go to war, and bitching about that too, at least he wasn't getting a ******** in the oval office, he at least took some aciton instead of literally effing around!I agree with Alie_sk8, blame religion, not bush

2006-12-29 07:55:07 · answer #1 · answered by boo 2 · 2 2

That is disrespectful to call the army a criminal army how dare you. Those people go over there as their JOB and as such have to follow orders. They risk their lives in the name of their country and you have the audacity to say they are criminals. At least they have enough balls to do something for their country instead of feeding off the social services that I have no doubt that you have dipped into one time or another. If it wasn't for people like them you would be speaking German right now or Japanese, so please before you decided to open your mouth and spout this nonsense again rethink it. I know it maybe a chore to do this, but it would be a great service to the rest of us.

2006-12-29 15:51:50 · answer #2 · answered by Shawn ! 1 · 3 1

LOL...

Really....awww...you sure? positive? Maybe I can produce a few #'s for you with references. Like a person should do with a stupid rant like this:

From China News: Survey: Saddam killed 61,000 in Baghdad
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-12/09/content_288443.htm

DOING the arithmetic is an imprecise venture. The largest number of deaths attributable to Mr. Hussein's regime resulted from the war between Iraq and Iran between 1980 and 1988, which was launched by Mr. Hussein. Iraq says its own toll was 500,000, and Iran's reckoning ranges upward of 300,000. Then there are the casualties in the wake of Iraq's 1990 occupation of Kuwait. Iraq's official toll from American bombing in that war is 100,000 — surely a gross exaggeration — but nobody contests that thousands of Iraqi soldiers and civilians were killed in the American campaign to oust Mr. Hussein's forces from Kuwait. In addition, 1,000 Kuwaitis died during the fighting and occupation in their country.
http://www.iraqfoundation.org/news/2003/ajan/27_saddam.html

http://www.shinesforall.com/archives/2006/07/dont_forget_sad.html

2006-12-29 15:54:37 · answer #3 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 3 1

IF YOU DON'T AGREE ON THE WAR IN IRAQ FOR WHATEVER REASON, READ THIS....

There were 39 combat related killings in Iraq in January. In the fair city of Detroit there were 35 murders in the month of January. That's just one American city, about as deadly as the entire war-torn country of Iraq.

When some claim that President Bush shouldn't
have started this war, consider the following:

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us; Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost ...an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost ...an average of 18,334 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam "conflict" in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost ..an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us The World Trad Center twice, The Pentagon, and a US Navy ship in Yeman.

In the years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya, Iran, and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.

The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking. But It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51-day operation.

We've been looking for evidence for chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Ted Kennedy to call the police after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took
to count the votes in Florida!!!!

Our Commander-In-Chief is doing a GREAT JOB! The Military morale is high!

The biased media hopes we are too ignorant
to realize the facts

If you can read this, thank a teacher.
If you are reading it in English thank a Veteran.

In God we Trust
"Pro Deo Et Patria"

2006-12-29 16:29:31 · answer #4 · answered by j.m.glass 4 · 2 1

Well let's just say that Bush has CAUSED the deaths of thousands of US military and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. The questioner is correct. Besides, most people in the US simply do not care about the Iraqis, the Kurds, or any other Middle Easterners including the Saudis. So face the truth. Underneath it all, the US wants Iraqi oil. And so do most in the United States. But let us face other facts also. Even the top brass in US military have admitted that the Iraqis are 'clever, intelligent people'.....they fight ...they use unconventional weapons. As soon as the US catches up with them, they find other ways to get out. We have a lot of enemies in Iraq.
If Bush had decided to use diplomacy with Saddam, he would have been a great president. In fact, the Iraqis would probably have been willing to share the oil WITHOUT fighting.
But that is the trouble with the U.S. Never willing to share.

2006-12-29 15:51:19 · answer #5 · answered by rare2findd 6 · 3 5

You are ignorant

Saddam has killed 10's of thousands and burried them is mass graves -- a conspicously forgotten fact the media loves to forget during an election year

get your head out of your ***

2006-12-29 15:48:16 · answer #6 · answered by pilotB 3 · 4 0

Not criminal and no proof of your statement. You would also do well to remember that the US is not the only army there. Also check to see how many have died at the hands of the insurgents and suicide bombers.

2006-12-29 16:47:06 · answer #7 · answered by mnwomen 7 · 1 1

Besides the fact you are full of it, nice try at posting pure bull and expecting anyone with an IQ over 70 to fall for it.

2006-12-29 18:27:32 · answer #8 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 1 1

No, you're WRONG! Call Mr. Bush whatever you want, but leave our boys alone. They're only doing what they're told to do, and need our support, not riducule. It's easy to sit in your safe chair and throw insults at these fellas who are risking their lives to help the helpless. <*)))><

2006-12-29 15:48:50 · answer #9 · answered by Sandylynn 6 · 4 1

YOU'RE SUCH AN IDIOT!! I can't believe I raised my right hand to protect people like you. And if you're not in the US then I'm glad that I don't have to protect you or your family.

2006-12-30 05:53:57 · answer #10 · answered by JULEE 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers