Who do u think would win a battle between Rome and Sparta in their prime?

Question

needed to update this
I'm talking about the roman war machine and Sparta before she took on the Persian empire. both were well disciplined but Rome would pull back in a fight Sparta wouldn't. so who do u think would win? and wouldn't it be great to see this on the history channel or the military channel some day?

now before u say the size of the roman army u have to remember that the spartans held of the whole persian empire

Answer 1

Im gonna have to go with Sparta on this one:
*Spartan male children were required to join the military and learn how to fight at the age of nine, creating amazing fighters once they matured.
*Sparta's entire lifestyle is one of military, whereas Rome focused more on the arts.
*Despite the Roman army's technology and sheer size, Sparta had amazing tactical strategies and had farly superior fighters.
*Sparta, in its prime time, was the ruler of the sea. By controlling the sea, they controlled half the trade. They could execute an incredible siege to overthrow Rome, with control of the sea, and their superior land units surrounding the city.

SPARTA
=]

Answer 2

The Roman Army did get slaughtered by Hannibal, but that was because the Roman general didn't know what he was doing.

But seriously man, the Romans in their prime would have destroyed the Spartans in their prime. Sure the Spartans held off the Persians but... the Romans were stronger than the Persians.

A large well trained army led by a good general can defeat a small well trained army (with strong warriors) led by a good general any day.
[Thats if they have the same technological weapons of course.]

Answer 3

The Roman soldiers would win - easily. The Romans tactical doctrine was more advanced than that of the phalanx. Roman legions were using the philim and gladius in more flexible formations and defeated (and conquered) the Greeks who were using the phalanx.

Another thing to remember is that the Romans used long-service, disciplined and professional soldiers. For all the hype about how good the Spartans were their army was still made up of part-time soldiers.

Answer 4

if we assume both sides have equal numbers i would say Sparta would win. I mean we saw what 300 Spartans led by Leonidas did to over 10,000 Persians...imagine if they had equal numbers.

And the Persian war machine was no slouch either..it was a large formidable army.

Answer 5

If just Sparta and not the rest of Greece. Rome would kick their butts. Be a hell of a battle, but definately Rome would win.

Answer 6

i think Rome had the terrific military below Julius Caesar. i'm unsure what Sparta's top time replaced into, yet even regardless of the indisputable fact that, i think Caesar would have defeated the Spartans. The Greek Phalanx wasn't made acceptable till Alexander's reforms, whilst he upgrated the communicate to be very very nearly 7 meters tall. That replaced into whilst the phalanx replaced into as deadliest. Rome made its reforms below Sulla and Marius, on the same time as Caesar superior the logistics and the staying power of the troops. The Roman military replaced into very reliable in terms of self-discipline, training, procedures, and armour high quality. The question is consequently slightly ahistorical, because of the fact the top of the two armies existed below diverse sessions of their era, which provides Rome an advantace in terms of technologies and journey. One additionally must bear in strategies that the phalanx replaced right into a great protecting unit, yet they infrequently went on offensive. particularly, they tried to weary the enemy on the same time as cavalry or different offensive instruments tried to direction them. The Roman legion, even regardless of the indisputable fact that, replaced into stable at the two protection and offense; and whether the two instruments favorite flat land, the legions would have accomplished extra constructive in harder terrain with the aid of their extra beneficial mobility. One additionally must bear in strategies that the Macedons, who had the phalanx uppgrated, won a Pyrrhic victory on the conflict of Asculum against Roman legions that have been green. they had in no way met elephants in conflict till now, and yet they brought about great casualties to the Macedons. i think of that Sparta's perfect strenghts have been consistent with satisfaction and honour on my own; their spirit replaced into consistent with emotions. Roman generals, even regardless of the indisputable fact that, cared extra approximately procedures and their management replaced into extra rational. So, whether the have been to win a conflict, Rome will certainly have won the conflict.

Answer 7

I think the spartan's would win because they were the archtype for all future professional soldiers to base themselves against.

Answer 8

i think sparta would win and i want it to be that way because i'm greek