English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What would a map of the world look like if both ice caps melted?

2006-12-29 06:53:33 · 10 answers · asked by Zefram 2 in Environment

10 answers

Try this:

http://merkel.zoneo.net/topo/applet/...

"These java applets calculate the effect of a change in sea level on the topography for different regions of the world, such as Europe, Japan, the United States, South-East Asia or France.

Input a value for the change of sea level (negative values for a decrease in sea level, positive value for an increase) in the left entry, the program recalculates the map of the region of interrest and adjusts the color scale.

A full melting of the polar ice caps would imply a rise of about 70-80 meters. "

2006-12-29 07:00:11 · answer #1 · answered by Yahzmin ♥♥ 4ever 7 · 1 0

If the polar ice caps melted it is predicted the sea level would rise 80 feet or more. This would inundate hundreds of thousands of square miles of coastal land. Every continent would be dramatically altered and at least 1 billion people displaced.
Without the ice sheets which deflect sunlight, the global warming already in effect would rise to tremendous levels further threatening all life on Earth with massive droughts, vicious storms, and killing heat.

2006-12-29 18:49:29 · answer #2 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 0

There would be plenty of land left above sea level. Over 90% of it. Only land less than a few hundred feet above present sea level would be flooded. Just get a contour map of the world and color all the places lower than 300 feet blue.

2006-12-29 14:57:39 · answer #3 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0 1

Nobody knows how much the water would rise. I believe there would be land above the water

2006-12-29 14:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by shadouse 6 · 0 0

1. Most definitely.
2. The low-lying coastal areas would be inundated.

2006-12-29 14:56:58 · answer #5 · answered by Jerry P 6 · 0 0

It would only raise ocean levels worldwide by 200 feet -- problematic for coastal cities

2006-12-29 14:56:53 · answer #6 · answered by dinotheorist 3 · 0 0

Yes, the tallest mountains would remain above the waterline.

2006-12-29 14:57:10 · answer #7 · answered by thomas 7 · 0 0

Yes. And to the second question, a lot less land.

2006-12-29 14:55:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There wouldn't be much of Florida left I don't think good bye Disney world

2006-12-29 15:02:39 · answer #9 · answered by conundrum_dragon 7 · 0 0

you will find out shortly

2006-12-29 14:56:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers