who do u think would win a battle between Rome and Sparta in their prime?

Question

I'm talking about the roman war machine and Sparta before she took on the Persian empire. both were well disciplined but Rome would pull back in a fight Sparta wouldn't. so who do u think would win? and wouldn't it be great to see this on the history channel or the military channel some day?

Answer 1

id have to go with sparta they had the strongest military and navy in greece they would smoke rome

Answer 2

ROME.

Rome "in its prime" was a massive empire stretching over thousands of miles. Sparta "in its prime" was just one small city state in Greece. Sparta would not have lasted a day.

Answer 3

haha yea like one of those CGI fantasy football matchups or like the rocky thing in his movie.

I think it would all depend on the location of the battle.
If you know the story that the upcoming movie 300 is based on, the battle of Thermopylae, then you know just how tough the Spartans were.

300 spartans along with about 5000 militia recruits went up against Xerxes' persian army of somewhere between 2.6 and 5 million ( depending on which historical estimate you go by )

Casualties were the 300 spartans about 700 or so of their recruits ( the rest they sent away before the last stand )
Estimates of the casualties of the persian army are from 20k to 100k depending again on which historical estimate ya go by.

Thats one crazy battle.
The movie looks pretty wierd but I will go see it out of curiosity.

Answer 4

Definitely Sparta beacuse the only thing they did was fight and train to fight.

Answer 5

i think Rome had the terrific military below Julius Caesar. i'm unsure what Sparta's top time replaced into, yet even regardless of the indisputable fact that, i think Caesar would have defeated the Spartans. The Greek Phalanx wasn't made acceptable till Alexander's reforms, whilst he upgrated the communicate to be very very nearly 7 meters tall. That replaced into whilst the phalanx replaced into as deadliest. Rome made its reforms below Sulla and Marius, on the same time as Caesar superior the logistics and the staying power of the troops. The Roman military replaced into very reliable in terms of self-discipline, training, procedures, and armour high quality. The question is consequently slightly ahistorical, because of the fact the top of the two armies existed below diverse sessions of their era, which provides Rome an advantace in terms of technologies and journey. One additionally must bear in strategies that the phalanx replaced right into a great protecting unit, yet they infrequently went on offensive. particularly, they tried to weary the enemy on the same time as cavalry or different offensive instruments tried to direction them. The Roman legion, even regardless of the indisputable fact that, replaced into stable at the two protection and offense; and whether the two instruments favorite flat land, the legions would have accomplished extra constructive in harder terrain with the aid of their extra beneficial mobility. One additionally must bear in strategies that the Macedons, who had the phalanx uppgrated, won a Pyrrhic victory on the conflict of Asculum against Roman legions that have been green. they had in no way met elephants in conflict till now, and yet they brought about great casualties to the Macedons. i think of that Sparta's perfect strenghts have been consistent with satisfaction and honour on my own; their spirit replaced into consistent with emotions. Roman generals, even regardless of the indisputable fact that, cared extra approximately procedures and their management replaced into extra rational. So, whether the have been to win a conflict, Rome will certainly have won the conflict.

Answer 6

My answer still stand..Rome ..was the most powerful ..
then came the Huns ..who destroyed it weakened it's powers ..where Attila showed no mercy to the Romans