Forget momentarily the immorality of owning slaves and hiring illegal aliens at unlivable wages.
Owning a slave required a large capital cost. Then there was feeding, clothing, housing, and medical care that the slave owner had to cover.
With hiring an illegal alien, there is no initial cost, the illegal is the one responsible for feeding, clothing, and housing themselves (and family) and the taxpayers will pay for the medical.
Plus a willing worker is more productive then an unwilling worker. And illegals are less likely to change jobs so turnover is lower. If one gets hurt or killed, there are many more waiting to take their place.
Now are both (involuntary slavery and voluntary slavery) immoral?
2006-12-29
04:36:21
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
If you check out "V"'s profile you will see why she posted such a hateful response.
She claims she is a business owner (how many illegals do you abuse for your personal financial gain?) and a mortgage broker (so you NEED the voluntary slaves to buy houses?).
I guess people do not like to have their morality questioned. V reminds me of the pro-slavery people who claimed slavery was better for the slaves that living free in poverty!
2006-12-29
05:58:28 ·
update #1
In fact check the profile of anyone that is "pro-illegal alien" I did and I found the majority were "business owners" or had answered or asked questions indicating friends or relatives were illegal.
To me that is as telling as a slave owner arguing for slavery! But eveyone is entitled to their own opinion!
2006-12-29
06:04:46 ·
update #2