Try reading the Bible for yourself, and then, if you have any serious questions, come back.
2006-12-29 02:37:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by ted.nardo 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
if/since you gave me all of your money, then would i really have it? just becaus i SAY that you gave me all of your money, doesn't mean that you did. let's make the correct assumptions first.
you seem to ask questions meant to trick and lead. do you truly want to know? why do you presuppose that Jesus did INDEED "replace" (replace being the keyword) Lucifer? aren't you taking it out of context. the original manuscripts capitalize Morning Star for Jesus and don't for Satan. Careful how you interpret this question/answer. Essentially, Jesus DID in fact replace Satan, because Satan was false. He is anti-Christ. He is a insufficient "replacement" for Christ. he doesn't fit the bill. He's an imposter. Jesus made good on the metaphor of being the Bright and Morning Star, where Satan only tries to make people believe that Satan is indeed the actual Morning Star. He isn't. Jesus showed Satan to be a fake.
Jesus isn't an angel. Whether the angel is Satan or ____ insert appropriate name of any angel (Bob, Jim, Sue), no angel can meet or exceed Jesus. Because angels aren't God. Jesus is God. You can't compare the Creator w/ the creation.
2006-12-29 11:35:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by blackhawks4life 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Both the Hebrew mal‧’akh′ and the Greek agge‧los literally mean “messenger.” From the first book of the Bible to the last, these words occur nearly 400 times. When spirit messengers are indicated, the words are translated “angels,” but if the reference definitely is to human creatures, the rendering is “messengers.” (Ge 16:7; 32:3; Jas 2:25; Re 22:8; see MESSENGER.) However, in the highly symbolic book of Revelation certain references to ‘angels’ may apply to human creatures.—Re 2:1, 8, 12, 18; 3:1, 7, 14.
I seem to think that Jesus has a message to give us when on earth.
2006-12-29 10:40:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by papa G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think youre confusing Morning Star with Angel of Light since Lucifer means Angel of Light.
Jesus was referred to The Morning Star and not Lucifer.
2006-12-29 10:40:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Triskelion 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Job talks about when the Morning Stars sang together. Jesus calls Himself the Bright and
Morning Star at the end of Revelation. And says
that He will give US the Morning Star at the
beginning of Revelation, if we overcome our
silliness, and "get with the program".
You can make your own determinations from there. I know there is an intellect in you
bursting to come out!
2006-12-29 10:51:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by THE NEXT LEVEL 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only Jesus is called the Morning Star (Rev 22:16), so you have wrong information for sure. Morning star is planet Venus, prominent by the fact that is brighter 5 times than any other celestial object.
2006-12-29 10:43:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by CyberPastor 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Morning star is either Venus or Mercury(not sure),not Jesus or Lucifer
2006-12-29 10:51:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by The atheist revolutionary 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Lucifer does not refer to an evil being and has nothing whatsoever to do with Satan or any fallen angel. This concept came from a mistranslation of the Hebrew original by St. Jerome.
2006-12-29 10:39:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by darth_maul_8065 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Your questions get stranger by the minute, don't they.
2006-12-29 10:40:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by jules 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Where did you come up with this question? Its very stupid.
2006-12-29 10:36:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋