I'm starting a list called "Reasons why Creationists are The Biggest Hypocrites in The World", can any1 help?

Question

1)They say that God created two human beings in order to populate the Earth, but also teaches us that incest is wrong
2)They say evolution is "just a theory" and "there isn't enough evidence to support it" instead posing a different idea that is even more ridiculous and has NO evidence to support it.
3) They say that "creationist scientists are working to prove the story of creation", yet SEVENTY-TWO Nobel Laureates compiled a brief for the supreme court explaining why creationism is NOT science (no creationist has ever received a Nobel award)
4)They say that creationist scientists are everywhere in science teaching the "truth", yet less than ONE-HALF OF ONE PERCENT of scientists consider creationism to be a viable theory.

This is all I have so far, does anyone else have anything to add to the list?

(And before any creationist comes along and tells me I am making up my facts, here is the link:)
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CA/CA111.html

ahhhhh, good one RED! I forgot that one.

sister steph, your answer shows an OBVIOUS lack of understanding concerning evolution. To answer your points:
1)The VERY BASIS for evolution is "natural selection, not "chance" as you put it. (You would know this if you spent 5 minutes reading about evolution)
2)They can't explain how an amoeba became a duck?!!! Sure they can! Just ask one silly!
3)There is TONS of evidence! Did you know that museum in Kenya is trying to display an exhibit showing the evolution of man USING ACTUAL FOSSILS, but are receiving death threats and protest letters from creatinoists all over the world?
4)They never try to consider another point of view???...yeah I am just going to ingore this point because you have obviously never spoken with an evolutionist, let alone ALL of them.
5)sure they come on this site ridiculing creationists...but creationists do the same thing!

6)the theory of how life started IS a completely different theory. Evolution just shows how life forms change over time, and does not try to show how life started on Earth.
7)your point makes no sense, I do not claim evolution to be the answer to everything.

Do you see how ridiculous your list is now? Mine has valid points about creationists, yours is a bunch of garbage that you wrote out of anger.

Answer 1

They assert that everything in the Universe has a cause, but they also assert that only the Creator is immune to this law.... and for no particular reason.

Answer 2

Only if I can start a list that says why Evolutionists are the Biggest Hypocrits in the World.

1. They think we all came by chance
2. They can't explain how an ameoba became a duck
3. They have no proof of how humans evolved and all their "evidence" comes from after humans became human
4. They never even try to concider another point of view, even though several creationists will say that evolution is possible after creation
5. They come on this site and then riddicule Creationists, sparking a flame war
6. When asked questions about how life started, they say that it's a completely different THEORY (i have proof of this answer, thank you)
7. Evolution has not been made a fact and is still a THEORY, but they think it's the only answer to everything

Answer 3

you may crack open a technology e book and notice what they are asserting approximately be counted, power, and the "advent" of the universe. i'm unlikely to enable you to recognize what to have faith, yet i've got studied those issues and the thought one and all created issues have a writer makes suited experience to me. all the subject interior the universe, in accordance to technology, had to have no longer quickly, at some time, been created. Scientists call it a "singularity", that's incredibly their way of asserting "God in simple terms is conscious". I in simple terms give up on the "God in simple terms is conscious" section. Is it this sort of stretch of the mind's eye nonetheless to assume that God is a nonmaterial religious being who consciously thought-approximately and created the ordered universe we see and stay in? issues do no longer create themselves, and any scientist or pseudo-scientist who claims they do, is being maximum un-scientific simply by fact by no skill has every physique stated the variety of element. you are able to placed your faith in that concept in case you pick, yet do no longer attempt to call it a scientific view, simply by fact each thing we actually word interior the organic international says otherwise.

Answer 4

So even if there are only a few thousand creation scientists, if you reject their evidence, just because they "believe in god" is that not hypocritical? Should not science by its very nature look at ALL the evidence, otherwise it really isn't scientific, if you ignore submitted evidence because it disagrees with what you are trying to prove.
I looked at your link, and suggest you look at the link on your link:
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=163

Answer 5

Maybe you can explain where the stuff came from that started everything that exists? Or can you explain, if we came from a big bang, what made the big bang? If the big bang is true, then why does Venus spin backwards from all other planets. They'd all be spinning the same way, wouldn't they? (The answer is yes!)

Search "Venus spins backwards" and see for yourself...

Answer 6

1. these two human beings are not brother and sister, nor cousins, nor anything else related. they were created not born. so this is not incest.

2. Evolution of Hominids to humans IS just a theory.

3. WOW! SEVENTY TWO! REALLY? Who cares. Big whoop. But then again just to check lets look at the definition of science.

Science:
1.a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws: the mathematical sciences.
2.systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through observation and experimentation.
3.any of the branches of natural or physical science.
4.systematized knowledge in general.
5.knowledge, as of facts or principles; knowledge gained by systematic study.
6.a particular branch of knowledge.
7.skill, esp. reflecting a precise application of facts or principles; proficiency.

O, yea I guess your right must not be a sci...wait whats that? number six(6. a particular branch of knowledge.) now let look at the definition of knowledge.

Knowledge:
1.acquaintance with facts, truths, or principles, as from study or investigation; general erudition: knowledge of many things.
2.familiarity or conversance, as with a particular subject or branch of learning: A knowledge of accounting was necessary for the job.
3.acquaintance or familiarity gained by sight, experience, or report: a knowledge of human nature.
4.the fact or state of knowing; the perception of fact or truth; clear and certain mental apprehension.
5.awareness, as of a fact or circumstance: He had knowledge of her good fortune.
6.something that is or may be known; information: He sought knowledge of her activities.
7.the body of truths or facts accumulated in the course of time.
8.the sum of what is known: Knowledge of the true situation is limited.

O, well i guess knowledge me... wait whats that number 3?(3. acquaintance or familiarity gained by sight, experience, or report: a knowledge of human nature.) The Bible, The Torah, and The Quran ARE reports. but just to be sure lets look at the definition of report.

report:
1.an account or statement describing in detail an event, situation, or the like, usually as the result of observation, inquiry, etc.: a report on the peace conference; a medical report on the patient.
2.a statement or announcement.
3.a widely circulated statement or item of news; rumor; gossip.
4.an account of a speech, debate, meeting, etc., esp. as taken down for publication.
5.a loud noise, as from an explosion: the report of a distant cannon.
6.a statement of a student's grades, level of achievement, or academic standing for or during a prescribed period of time.
7.Computers. output, esp. printed, containing organized information.
8.a statement of a judicial opinion or decision, or of a case argued and determined in a court of justice.

Well, they fit into the first definition of the word report.


So I think we have determined that these "Nobel Laureates" ARE WRONG because creationism IS a science.

4. OK, and? they are a minority in science. So? Aristotle believed that the world was round although everyone else thought it to be flat. He was a minority in science, and yet he turned out to be right.


Well that was a pretty short list. I hope I helped.

Answer 7

Be sure to include that book they read The Bible,it was written over thousands of years,governments have been founded on its principles,gives answers to all of todays problems as it did before Christ was born,it's doctrines are holy it's precepts binding.It contains the mind of God,the state of man,the way of salvation,the doom of unbelievers,and the happiness of believers.
It rule's my heart and guides my feet.Boy I'm sure darwins book was much better though.The link listed no doubt is only speculation and no true scientific fact given just conjecture and lies.

Answer 8

Is there really a question in all this? Creationism as well as evolution are both theories that have not been empirically proven to the satisfaction of either opposing side. Kindly refrain from poking fun at someone elses system of beliefs as they are as important to them as your are to you. And they are just as valid.

Answer 9

Truth is relative don't you think? What is the opposite of "truth"?

Answer 10

no;sorry I cant