Working people have been the pawns of the wealthy since we gave up being hunters and gatherers.
Countries and borders were created to keep the wealthy in power, not to help the working people.
The 19th century took the world from formal slavery, to a new kind of slavery, "WAGE SLAVERY"
Ask yourself the real questions:
Can you really just quit your job, or will your family go hungry?
Can you really go where you want, when you want or will you not have a place to live?
Will you be punished if you dont work? If you think not, ask the bill collector!
YOU ARE A SLAVE!
2006-12-28 23:58:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anarchy99 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Absolutly. It's not just happening here....it's globally. I know there are people that beleive that as long as people aren't packed like sardines and there's a plot of land to build on......we have room for more people. Whether it be in the US or elsewhere. Truth is, that's not the case. There is a world-wide tension between poverty and those getting by. Governments and the wealthy can just sit in their protected places and watch the havoc below. Whether it be race, relegion or survival......they are allowing and encouraging it and I beleive it is to purposly cause civil tensions so we weed out the population for them and then at just the right time......they'll come to the rescue and suddenly you will see they have the power and ability to secure borders, enforce laws and everything else they claim they just can't do or won't do now.
I mean we have genocide in countries that is going on right now and no government or even the UN is doing anything about it. We're in a war that we could win but they just don't provide enough people and equiptment to do the job or limit the action by being PC while it just keeps going on getting worse and worse day by day with innocent people dying on a daily basis. We have "open borders" here and in Europe and it's splitting countries in 2. There's a limit to jobs, services, housing, natural resources etc. and a limit to openmindedness and diversity and multi-curturalism that a nation can absorb and still function. It's pushing people to survival mode and that's not a pretty picture. One country is dumping it's problems on another country while that country is expected to allow the very things that destroyed the other and no-one is allowed to put a halt to anything that proves to be a detrement to that country's citizens. Whether it be here or in Europe or elsewhere. It makes no sense what-so-ever except for civil unrest to cull the population.
2006-12-29 02:47:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I certanley think that globabl leaders take the common people for fools. Those that are in control do not easily give it up. Bush and congress have done a wretched job in controling our borders thus not protecting the citizens and tax payers of the US. Fine every employer $10,000 for first offense of employing someone without a valid social security number that can be verified. $20,000 for second offense and a 5 year sentance for the third offense. How easy would that be? These people would have no work and would go home. Our country is and was built on immigrants but not illegal immigrants coming over here nilly willy.
2006-12-28 23:52:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well, YEAH!! We elect the officials in the U.S.) and they manipulate us to accomplish their own goals. I hate to be a cynic but when it gets down to it we're not voting for the best person for the job, we're voting for the lesser of the evils. A lot of people think George Bush is bad but he won over John Kerry. Think how bad Kerry must be? Back in the 90's a Senator or Congressman (I wish i could remember the name) was overheard to say something to the affect that as long as they (the politicians) keep the b*ast*rds (us) in the dark things will be fine. That right there is what goes on in the government the majority of the time, I'm convinced of that. And you're right about immigration. I truly believe that if this isn't curtailed, it will become so that it isn't safe to go out for fear of racial retaliation.
2006-12-29 01:40:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Spud55 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think they have gotten so used to leveraging corporate assets of a target company to use the loan value of its own assets to take control of the company that they are 'leveraging' the country the same way. The result of leverage is a bigger entity (economy) which for those dancing on top gives them more opportunities. But it comes about as a result of more debt and burden which are born by the majority shareholders responsible for paying back debt (the middle class). Here they are also hampering our ability to pay back the debt by going after jobs with outsourcing and domestic wages with mass immigration legal and illegal. The latter hits our standard of living, particularly education, more immediately and jeopardizes our own ability to compete on the world stage. The other is more like massive credit card debt, will cripple us in the end, but is insidious so long as the 'goods' keep flooding in.
It makes me think more of Enron than Machiavelli, but Enron wasn't a great thing for people holding pensions there, now was it?
2006-12-29 01:10:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by DAR 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
the so-called world leaders only think of their legacies not the working class people.By the way the principle of legal and illegal immigration had long been violated ever since the British took Australia from the native aborigines and America from the native americans.
2006-12-28 23:53:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i think so because thats the name of the game and a simple person in a country are called colateral damage people dont have choice but to obey to those global leaders thinking that it is really for the benifit of their country giving everything they got not knowing that they are being slave by their own leaders so it is really called slavery no more no less...
2006-12-29 00:04:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by JOEY G 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Public school teaches people to be sheep. Private schools teach kids to grow up to herd the sheep.
If you read the news carefully, you are likely to notice that the way various countries vote on world changing decisions, is based on their expected financial profit.
2006-12-29 00:10:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Clown Knows 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes
2006-12-28 23:46:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dr Dee 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes - If we were all rich they would lose their power / control / authority. So they keep us poor and use us in their little games of business trade and democracy.
2006-12-29 00:27:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by sassy_natz 2
·
1⤊
0⤋