Well, on a standard homeowners, NOTHING. On your policy, I bet it wouldn't be covered, either. Call your agent and ask. The standard homeowners/renters policy covers "stuff" for "named perils", and falling (or knocking over/down) isn't a named peril.
If you have a high-end policy like a CHUBB homeowners, contents are covered on a "risk of direct physical loss" basis, which DOES cover knocking over, but those policies usually have a hefty deductible (starting at $2500), and are very expensive to begin with.
2006-12-29 01:15:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the policy does not cover it, like you were wise enough to get for yourself, than the best he can expect is a letter from the agent saying they wont pay for it.
But, if he does have some type of coverage, there are 2 possibilities, both of them are based on the type of coverage purchased (less the deductible, if any): he could get replacement cost, which will get him a new one or similar at the original price. Depreciated cost, which will pay a certain percentage of it depending on the age of TV.
2006-12-29 08:57:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ricks 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well whats the tv value? whats his deductible? if its a $1000 tv and he has a $500 ded, he needs to think hard about it before making a claim that will pay him only $500. Not really worth it for a claim that will show on him for 3-5 yrs. his policy may cover it, he needs to call his agent. I have had clients that accidentally damage property themselves and the companies pay.
2006-12-29 08:17:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Queen B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If he's only got ordinary contents insurance, and he was the one who knocked it over, zilch.
If he's got accidental damage cover, there's usually a limit of £500 or £1,000 on a single item that's not specified in the schedule.
2006-12-29 04:44:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If his insurance policy doesn't cover accidental damage then probably nothing at all.
2006-12-29 04:44:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
impossible to answer without sight of the policy .
2006-12-29 04:45:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋