If you don't trust evolution because its a theory, what other theories do you distrust?

Question

Parts of the Copernican world model, such as the contention that the earth rotates around the sun, and not vice versa, have not been verified by direct observations. Yet scientists accept the model as an accurate representation of reality. Why then do we accept the "mere theory" that the earth is a sphere revolving around a spherical sun?

Answer 1

I don't trust gravity. Sneaky bugger is always tripping me up.

As explained in the link below, Gravity can't be proved, is only a theory, and should not be taught in schools.

"It is not even clear why we need a theory of gravity -- there is not a single mention in the Bible, and the patriotic founding fathers never referred to it."

Answer 2

While they may not be direct as in with the naked eye, infallable observations have been made to confirm the solar system is heliocentric.

The only reason religious nuts don't trust science in the field of evolution is because they're told not to by ministers and pastors. As soon as they come up with a mainstream explanation for the contridiction between Genesis and evolution theory it'll pass, much in the way a spherical Earth was accepted despite Biblical contradictions.

Answer 3

Actually, both the Earth and the Sun are oblate spheroids, not spheres. Theories can have small errors or information gaps and still be sound. If I applied Creationist "reasoning", the Earth would not orbit the Sun because you called them spheres.

Answer 4

some factors of it, definite... each and every thing and all people evolves faster or later or yet another. examine "The Case for faith". Lee Strobel dedicates a financial disaster to this and interviewed Walter L. Bradley, PH.D. those are purely distinctive the factors he made: - "..the mathematical odds of assembling a living organism are so astronomical that no-one nonetheless believes that random probability debts for the beginning of existence. in spite of in case you optimized the situations, it does not paintings. in case you took each and every of the carbon interior the universe and positioned it on the face of the earth, allowed it to chemically react on the main speedy cost a threat and left it for one billion years, the percentages of coming up only one smart protein molecule could be one probability in a 10 with 60 zeroes after it." - "...the threat of linking jointly purely one hundred amino acids to create one protein molecule by probability could be comparable to a blindfolded guy looking one marked grain of sand someplace interior the vastness of the Sahara barren region - and doing it not purely as quickly as, yet 3 diverse instances." there's a lot greater advice in his e book. Even it you're a non-believer, this is a sturdy examine.