If homosexuality is natural, then what is the matter with the rest of the heterosexuals? If it was suppose to be that way, the population of the earth would have been 2. Can there be to naturals.
2006-12-28 17:10:06 · 13 answers · asked by ? 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I mean on offense and we have seen worse questions than this posted.
2006-12-28 17:12:48 · update #1
I am Christian and heterosexual.
2006-12-28 17:17:32 · update #2
Thanks oldguy63 I was looking for that scripture earlier
2006-12-28 17:51:33 · update #3
Homosexuality is not natural. God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. May God Bless U.
2006-12-28 17:13:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is a significant difference between natural and commonplace. Homosexuality is exhibited by some humans, and some species of other animals, and hence is natural, but is obviously a lethal gene, so cannot be commonplace. Heterosexuality is obviously necessary for the race to survive; since it is commonplace, we are all here.
2006-12-29 01:15:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both homosexuality and heterosexuality are natural. There is only one natural. Same reason that whales and pigs are both natural. There is only one "nature."
2006-12-29 01:12:51 · answer #3 · answered by Roman Soldier 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, there can be two naturals. Why couldn't there be?
Besides, it doesn't hurt anything.
Love is always good, but you'll go on with your hatred of homosexuals no matter what I say.
2006-12-29 01:12:46 · answer #4 · answered by A 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm assuming by "natural" you mean within nature. homosexuality has been observed in many species.
PS. The Earth needs more human reproduction like you need another anus. gay people are good for the planet.
2006-12-29 01:13:41 · answer #5 · answered by nebtet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course many behaviors can be natural. Eating plants is natural - and so is eating animals. Can they both be true? Of course. Different tastes.
2006-12-29 01:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by eri 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Homosexuals Well!. xx
2006-12-29 01:21:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"A rose by any other name is still a rose"
A sin by any other name is still a sin.
Romans 1:27 "...the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error."
2006-12-29 01:15:27 · answer #8 · answered by oldguy63 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
...what? There's nothing wrong with heterosexuals. We just like the opposite sex...You know, the ones we can reproduce with..?
2006-12-29 01:14:02 · answer #9 · answered by Poo 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"If" is the operative word here.
Most people believe that homosexuality is a sin.
2006-12-29 01:14:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋