English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Instead of fish and bread.

2006-12-28 13:53:44 · 17 answers · asked by Night Shade 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

He handed out Tootsie Rolls to the kids.

2006-12-28 13:56:47 · answer #1 · answered by S K 7 · 0 0

As chocolate was not native to the area of the world where Jesus lived, and the process for making it eatable not yet know, it is unlikely that he ate chocolate. They only times that the Bible mentions what Jesus ate, bread, fish, honeycomb, and wine are the only foods mentioned. While Jesus had the ability to use all the powers of God, you will not find him creating unknown food, materializing a car so he could avoid walking, or creating a computer to record his saying. He normally limited himself to only the things available to any other human at that time.

Part of what he did was to show that it was possible for a human, with only the power of the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, to live a perfect life. So his power were only used to benefit others, not himself. He feed the multitude by a miracle, but send his disciples into town to buy him food (see John 3). He walked on water to reach his disciples when in a storm and in danger of sinking, but used a boat when he was crossing for himself.

Besides, he could have been like me, and not particularly liked chocolate...

2006-12-28 14:09:07 · answer #2 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 0 0

Chocolate comes from cocoa beans, native to the New World. They were not known in that part of the world until the Spanish visited Mexico in the 16th Century. Jesus could not have eaten chocolate.

2006-12-28 13:56:33 · answer #3 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 0 1

Chocolate is a new world food -- so was not available in the Middle East for another 1600 years.

2006-12-28 14:09:10 · answer #4 · answered by Ranto 7 · 0 0

The Bible says that people called Jesus a wine bibber and a glutton cause he liked to party

2006-12-28 14:03:23 · answer #5 · answered by Tommiecat 7 · 0 0

I don't think that chocolate was available in the Roman Empire since it comes from South America.

Hey, maybe if the Mormons are right..........

2006-12-28 13:59:20 · answer #6 · answered by Alex 6 · 0 0

Jesus would have indulged in a chocolate bar I am sure.

2006-12-28 14:03:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Are you like 9 years old / is this the best that Atheist have come up with that you send in little children to ask questions

2006-12-28 13:56:39 · answer #8 · answered by Terry S 5 · 0 2

If he wasnt omnipotent - he cant be God - and if he was omnipotent he wouldnt have needed food and rest (which he did)

he wasnt omnipotent and therefore he wasnt God

2006-12-28 13:58:03 · answer #9 · answered by jewish n proud 2 · 0 1

No. Chocolate wasn't invented 2000 years ago.

2006-12-28 13:55:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers