If delinquent behavior surfaced, it was tended to immediately with a belt or a trip to the wood shed. Children were never allowed to talk back and throw tantrums like they are now a days. Family values were taught and instilled in children. Now we have a disease for everything a child does wrong. The parents are blamed but rights have been stripped from the parents. It is hard to back hand a child for smarting off these days without fear of being arrested for abuse. A trip to the wood shed built character and a tough back side!
2006-12-29 01:29:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by cytopia1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i imagine Saturnfive is ideal! he's declaring in a sarcastic way basically what is going to happen. The boy will on the attorneys coaching, say 'i did not propose it' and 'i did not propose to kill her' which they are going to rapidly communicate about he did not. the very truth she died because of his movements will be lined up through some physician declaring at her age she would have died besides! (some human beings imagine all and sundry they provide idea to previous and therefore ineffective, should be euthanised besides.). some psychiatrist will say the boy is suffering 'complications' and needs help in a unit someplace among the innocuous victims of authentic psychological ailment. The device will bend over backwards to 'rehabilitate him'! Justice for the criminal sure. For the sufferer, NO! human beings will be out-raged regardless of the indisputable fact that it received't give up the 'do-gooders' declaring he has 'rights' and battling teeth and nail to work out that he receives them! Will it make the young children of at present evaluate something except their own egocentric needs? perchance for a short time! Will it make human beings imagine more desirable about basically HOW VUNERABLE our elderly inhabitants is? I doubt it!
2016-10-16 22:13:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothin sophisticated about a justice system that has a disease for every twerp who commited a crime.
70 years ago they had reform schools for all these a.d.d
dorks.that is untill all of the bottom feeder lawyers stood
up for their rights and sued anything that cried foul.
the spanking was a good tool when applied with love and
administered responsibly.now u can't look at a kid hard
without big brother breathin down your neck.
2006-12-28 13:47:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually with a leather strap or willow branches in the wood shed. But, children were taught honesty and integrity from birth so there weren't many delinquents. Why, most of the young women remained virgin until they were married, and you could actually leave your property unguarded and nobody would steal it. The right wing warned us Rock N' Roll would destroy our civilization, I guess they were right.
2006-12-28 13:48:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by darkdiva 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Some families used physical punishment and some that had real mean kids ran for the hills.
2006-12-28 13:45:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kreutzer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, sir, before the whole sophisicated justice system evolved, it was o.k. to beat the fukc out of your kids and not go to jail....'nuff said.
2006-12-28 13:43:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by XXXDirtyDirtyGirlXXX 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most kids were brought up better than nowadays. They respected their elders or got a kick in the pants!
2006-12-28 13:49:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by •♦๑•TxRose•♦๑• 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Publicly flogged them. Caned them, whipped them, drug them through town tied by a rope to a horse, put them in the stocks and pelted them with rocks and rotten produce, stripped them naked and tarred and feathered them, drowned them and hung them. And THAT'S no tongue in cheek.
2006-12-28 13:43:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
We didn't have any juvinile delequent problem in our day and none of my friends were juvinile delequents because he got out BEHINDS WOOOPED and it wasn't called ABUSE..There was a differnce in a Wooping and a beating..
2006-12-28 13:51:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by gblue52 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Juvenile delinquency did not exist then. It didn't dare.
2006-12-28 13:44:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by mld m 4
·
0⤊
0⤋