How Do you feel about the Darfur and Iraq situation and about the U.S. Nation going to war?

Question

Okay the people that think that war is not needed are fuqking STUPID!

We need to be in war for a number of reasons.
Clinton had at LEAST 3 chances to kill Osadun bin lauden ((sp.??)).
but he said NO to all of those chances.
And because of that he has KILLED thousands-maybe MILLIONS of people because if Clinton had killed him when he got a chance then there wouldn't have been all those gas poisonings that killed tons of people!! and we would already be 10 steps ahead of where we are right now if we killed him THEN!
Clinton is a BAD BAD man and if you agree...tell me!!
anywayss..Bush is the good guy. i don't understand why everybody "hates" him...If it weren't for HIM-making us go out to war then we could all be DEAD right now! because the troops has already killed a bunch of people in Al' Queda ((sp.?)) that could've done harm to the US.
And Bush has already told us all that this was would take a long long LONG time b/c we have never been in a situation like this!!

And when i say in a "situation" like this i mean we've never had to deal with people that PRAISE other people for BOMBING them selves as well as other people in the process of killing them self! So of course getting in a war with them will take a LONG time because they don't mind hurting THEIR people!
You people think that this will all be over OVER night! but its already been years and its ganna be a lot more years!!
So if you all think that HILARY Clinton would be the best President ever you guys are going to hell.
Because she is a threat to the United State. She will do NOTHING to help us. If she took CLINTON back after he cheated on her a NUMBER of times...she is insane.

Tell me what you all think =)

Answer 1

The Darfur massacres are due to failure of those with strength to come to the defense of the defenseless. The UN has utterly failed in its mission to put a stop to such international brutality. International? Yes, Al Qaeda fighters are flocking from all over the world to Darfur, now to Somalia, to conquer those lands under Islam.

The people of Iraq will suffer similarly if those with strength retreat before those people can hold the Islamists off by themselves.

I notice that those 'Save Darfur' commercials and bumper stickers don't include the words, "Let's bomb those Islamists, make more terrorists if need be, but defeat them in the long run." That is implied but to be able to later scream about US Aggression those folks demanding we do something cannot spell out exactly what they want us to do.

Answer 2

I am all for the war in Iraq. We toppled the corupt regime and owe it to the Iraqi people to stay there until the new government is stable.

As for Darfur, I don't know enough about it. All I know is that all the celebrities condeming the American Government as killers for being in Iraq want us to go into Darfur. Is this so they will have something to put down our government at a future date???

Answer 3

I think that the US was in a catch 22 in regards to Iraq. We were damned if we do and damned if we don't. In regards to Dafur, that is a humantarian issue, not a security issue. It is a crying shame, but that is what it is. I feel the US needs to be on the offensive, instead of pandering to these pansy liberals and kick some terrorist butt.

Answer 4

The U.S doesn't need another war right now especially with Bush as president. It would be helpfull if we could give the victims some money to cope with there losts or train the people to defend themselves.

Answer 5

unfortunately no one talks about Darfur, just look at trendio it is never quoted in media: http://www.trendio.com/word.php?wordid=1865&language=en not surprising nobody cares then...