The Taurus didn't replace anything in 1986, it was a whole new line of front wheel drive sedans , they still continued to make LTD's with rear wheel drive until 1991 :)
2006-12-28 14:28:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WELL Mr. Summit Ford is a MORON the Ford 500 replaced the Taurus. (as a car salesman you should know about UPgraded Roomier replacements--Think about it Crown Vic- Taurus-Contour-Escort NOW Crown Vic-500-Fusion-Focus) the Fusion replaced the Contour and the Contour replaced the Tempo Which replaced the Fairmont. The Focus replaced the Escort. and the Taurus as said was a whole new lineup of FWD sedans BUT it also replaced the Granada, which was the replacement for the Galaxie 500 and the LTD Replaced the Fairlane but it got replaced by the Crown Victoria--Which was a trim package for the---FAIRLANE
2006-12-28 17:40:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Keith C 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought it was the Galaxy 500. If so, is this a coincident?! They replaced the the Galaxy 500 back then with the Taurus and just replaced the Taurus with the new Ford Five-Hundred! (sorry to the guy who said that Fusion replaced the Taurus)...
2006-12-28 09:46:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by redskyblackdream 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
As a mid sided car the predecessors to the Ford Taurus include the Ford LTD and Ford Granada.
It basically has been succeeded by the Ford Fusion (smaller) and Ford Five Hundred (larger)
2006-12-28 09:41:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by hsueh010 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Taurus replaced the Ford Granada and Fairmont as their mid-sized sedan. The Taurus was a giant leap forward as it was much more space-efficient, aerodynamic and utilized front-wheel drive instead of rear-wheel drive like the Granada and Fairmont. It was also the best selling car in America for a number of years...
2006-12-28 09:39:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Granada was replaced by the Taurus, which ended production in Oct/Nov 2006. The Fusion did replace the Taurus (NOT the Five Hundred). The Five Hundred is actually larger than the Taurus especially in luggage capacity with 108.3 cubic feet of passenger volume and 21.2 cu. ft of luggage capacity.
The Fusion has 100 cu. ft of passenger volume and 15.8 cu ft of luggage capacity (although it is more useable than the Taurus due to hinge design). The Taurus had 104.4 cu ft of passenger volume and 17.0 cu. ft of luggage capacity. The measurements on head, hip, shoulder, and leg room are nearly identical to the fusion, within a few tenths of an inch. areas where the Taurus has more space are front head room (1.3" due to higher seat placement in Fusion for visibility) and rear hip (2.3") and leg room (1.9").
2006-12-28 11:46:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Summit Ford - BJ 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Galaxy 500, and now the Fusion has replaced the Taurus
2006-12-28 09:37:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by oklatom 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
It makes a huge distinction which engine it has. the three.0 Vulcan's have been lifeless solid. the pinnacle gasket failure grow to be constrained to easily the three.8, simply by fact it had aluminum heads on an iron block, and head gasket technologies grow to be in simple terms so solid. If the cylinder heads cracked or warped, it truly is simply by fact the engine grow to be operated at excessively intense temperature for too long, yet otherwise, the heads won't fail. i think greater recent head gaskets are accessible that final longer. the three.2 DOHC SHO engine grow to be super, yet which would be costly to restoration. Icontinual an '89 Taurus LX and revel in it very lots; it at the instant has over 203k miles. The transmission grow to be rebuilt at 165k miles, simply by fact there grow to be a spring interior that snapped thoroughly in 0.5, and allowed hydraulic tension to go have been it wasn't meant to, which manifested as a caught throttle. while it grow to be rebuilt, the guy on the save instructed me the band and seize packs have been wiped out, yet there hasn't been any catastrophic disaster: my transmission has held up positive. One little bit of advice: make beneficial all vacuum lines are actually not cracked. I had a tee on suitable of my carbon canister that grow to be cracked in 0.5, and the vacuum leak led to a sensation as though the engine grow to be misfiring and upshifting way too early from OD to third. Small vacuum leaks could have you ever chasing after enormous issues while they are truly low priced to restoration.
2016-10-28 14:01:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by arrocha 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Galaxy 500?
2006-12-28 09:35:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋