I never heard anyone dropping a tear for the Nigerians,,whom some of them are truly starving, I beileve that 99% of the illegals from South of the border are not starving at all,,some are even fat when they come over, If you are getting your daily nutrition and have a roof over your head everything else is in life is just a matter of perspective, I can hardly see why it's our obligation tho give a non-starving person a free ticket into this country
and why doesn't anyone want to help the real starving people in Africa and particularly the Sudan where humanitarians are needed for real,, pro-illegals are a real joke in my mind
2006-12-28
03:39:52
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
"my people" is a very dumb and ethnocentric term seirvo
2006-12-28
04:33:56 ·
update #1
cheap labor . it will come back to hunt the usa
2006-12-28 03:44:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I've often wondered that myself. We should be taking in true refugees, not just people who have jobs but see an opportunity to make more $$ here. Mexico has oil $$$, it has tourism $$$, it has mining & industry $$$, hell, it has lots of drug $$$$$$$$$$ too!
The people of the Darfur region have squat, and a war to boot.
Mexico itself should be taking in these people as well.
The real key is that Africans have little political leverage in this nation as a minority while Hispanics have a burgeoning voice & in my opinion, no tradition of helping those of other ethnicities around the world . . . in fact, does Mexico even have a budget for foreign aid? I think I'll ask . . . .
2006-12-28 05:58:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by SWMynx 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pro-illegals are a joke. They are an embarassment to themselves and a real danger to this country. They are easily swayed by the "feel good" rhetoric put out by those that seek to undermine and destroy this country. If it feels good, do it, and if it sounds good support it.
The facts are overwhelmingly against allowing illegal imigration to continue. It is far too costly for no real benefit. Unfortunately adopting immigration policies like Mexico has just doesn't sound good. Sounds harsh, and besides, Mexico would call us racist if we adopted their policies and we couldn't have that.
The real solution to the problem is to place a line item on form 1040. "How much do you want to contribute to support illegal aliens?" "This will INCREASE your tax liability.
I would venture that when asked to put their money where their mouth is you wouldn't find much support.
2006-12-28 04:32:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bob G 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
it relatively is a generic for me to pay attention somebody of cuban/puerto rican respectable talk this style approximately mexicans......it supplies me an entire new which ability to "Latinos"....yet what approximately Hispanic??? Why do they (mexicans) call themselves that each and all and sundry the time?
2016-11-24 20:08:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by krausz 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They really are in the sense you are asking your question. There are plenty worldwide that need humanitarian needs; yet, the pro's worry too much about Mexico and bring it up often in their questions. I am tired of LaRaza, KKK, references by them and the mere fact they must bring up racism and poverty to further their desire to promote criminal behavior specifically by Latino needs. Good question.
2006-12-28 05:28:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's because the immigration issue isn't the real agenda. Chnging the law to the benefit of illegal mexican invaders is the real agenda.
2006-12-28 03:50:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
You are right. They hardly ever defend any illegals besides Mexicans. There are people in other countries whose lives are much worse.
2006-12-28 03:45:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Niecy 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I have been saying this all the time, even though the immigrants from Africa are so hungry and so poor they respect our immigration laws! God i hate illegal mongrels
2006-12-28 04:06:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because Latinos are my people, that's why.
2006-12-28 04:32:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Siervocal 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well said...
2006-12-28 03:54:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋