Is it Kumar sangakkara,Gilchrist,Dhoni or Boucher
I believe its a competition between Gilchrist and Sangakkara
Both of them have scored really well in all conditions while dhoni is confined to play well in indian,pakistani flat tracks and no textbook style at all.While Sangakkara and Gilchrist have played on every surface very well and have kept wickets very well.
Out of them who do u like da most? why do u like each individual
2006-12-28 03:00:10 · 15 answers · asked by SOAD_ROX 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Well KANGA if u have not seen the 2 from the sub continent that means u dun knw much abt cricket!Hence u don deserve to answer this question!
2006-12-30 22:29:48 · update #1
I think it is Gilchrist
Because he is excellent batsman as well as excellent wicket keeper.
2006-12-28 03:07:42 · answer #1 · answered by Savio 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gilchrist
2006-12-29 00:14:23 · answer #2 · answered by qadir k 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Adam Gilchrist is the best Wicket Keeper Batsman as compared to others due to following reason:
1) He has taken more catches and effected more stumpings.
2) Better average and better strike rate.
3) Scored more centuries and half centuries.
4) Very attacking batsman.
For comparison of the statistics of Gilchrist and Sangakkara, please check the following links:
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/australia/content/player/5390.html
http://content-usa.cricinfo.com/srilanka/content/player/50710.html
2006-12-28 21:59:26 · answer #3 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no doubt that Gilchrist is best wicket-keeper batsman.Gilchrist's nature as a player is good. He encourage his teammates.Also he plays stylish.
2006-12-28 05:15:34 · answer #4 · answered by MAYUR 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no doubt that it is Gilchrist. His all round game is fantastic and really he doesn`t have any faults. He is smart and quick witted, his general keeping is good and he is the best batsman of any keeper, as he proved with the 2nd quickest test century in the history of test cricket against us (England)
2006-12-28 03:16:11 · answer #5 · answered by bwfc 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The two from the sub-continent I haven't seen. But even though Gilly is diminishing he's still the best!
Worlds 2nd fastest century...need i say more?
Reply to Asker:
Why take notice of them unless they set records that reach the rest of the world (aside from their homelands). If their exploits dont make international impact then they are hardly "Greats"!
2006-12-29 17:51:23 · answer #6 · answered by kanga 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it's glichrist .. but sangakkara is not far behind.
I picked gilchrist because of the kind of attack he takes to the opposition.
2006-12-29 08:17:47 · answer #7 · answered by annoose1 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the best is adam gilchrist. he is one of the best batsman of the world and his a keeper
2006-12-28 08:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by lauti29 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
oh' C'mon....get a life...Adam Gilchrist RULES.....by all means gilly has got no competition watsoever.....especially b'cuz of his incredible experience cumin' into the game...He'll surely retire as an all time best!
2006-12-28 03:34:20 · answer #9 · answered by nick 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sangakkara has a slight edge over Gilchrist because
1) He is a really good keeper
2) He bats well both in tests and limited over matches
3)His technique is copy book.
4) Gilchrist is excellent in limited overs but his batting isn't that good in tests also his technique is'nt that good
2006-12-28 03:28:13 · answer #10 · answered by GUK 3 · 0⤊ 5⤋