was hitler superior to most humans?

Answer 1

Lets take this question with out the moral implications.
He had an amazing memory. He had a photographic memory and could assimilate that information to understand every single puzzle piece. But he had a poor understanding about how the pieces fit together. He had a poor understanding of large scale problems and how other people saw these things. He did not have a polyglot around him, and this cause a lack of pleurisy in his ideas.
Aside from that physically he was a wreck. He was soon to die if not by his own hand. He was not that athletic and had a bad digestion system. He required normal amounts of sleep.
So he was smart, but he was not superior to most humans.
b

Answer 2

Even though it is an 'off-colour' topic, I think this is a very interesting question. If you look at his accomplishments from a non-humanities point of view (as in just stand back and look) he did accomplish a lot-he took over a large portion of Europe using a weak country. He rebuilt Germany after WW1. He actually went pretty far along the track to his goal of killing all Jews. However, none of his goals were very. . .shall we say, acceptable in the modern world. By which I mean he was a murderer. I don't believe he was superior to other humans, he was just extremely charismatic and talented. THAT DOESN'T EXCUSE WHAT HE DID. I still believe that he was a monster. But he was very talented for accompliching what he did (even though it was not good things he accomplished). Think about it this way: if you decided tomorrow that you were going to take over Europe, or NA, or Africa, or whatever, do you think you could do it in your lifetime? I know I couldn't. Most people couldn't. It just happens that the ones who can, or a good percentage of them, are so power-hungry that it gets out of control. So, I believe Hitler was talented, though extremely evil, but not superior to other humans. This question seems a little too open-ended, though: what is 'superior' defined as?

Answer 3

Are you crazy?

He was a tramp, a mommys boy.

He was not superior

He want only people with blonde hair and blue eyes as the aryan race. When he, himslef didn't have blonde hair nor blue eyes.

He was a low life, mad man, mass murder, that should of been killed before he gained power, becfore he became councellor

Answer 4

Hitler was a mad man like Saddam Hussein.

His early success was the result of France and England not realising that he was mad.

England and France thought they could negociate with him... when he double crossed them... they were caught with their pants down.

Answer 5

He was a short, brown eyed, dark haired Austrian who convinced the German people that the best thing to be was tall, blond haired and blue eyed aryan. And that he should be their leader.
He must have been an amazing orator.
Crazy as a ****-house rat, but a great orator nonethe less

Answer 6

In terms of fortitude, most definitely; YES! His story of raising from "rags to power" is second to none. Unfortunately, he used his superior fortitude entirely in the service of evil.

Answer 7

Hitler was a sick demented individual that took his self hatred of being part Jewish and turned it against the innocents of the world.

Answer 8

i think so, that does not mean i like him, i hate the prick, but i think if he didnt kill the jews, and others, and had a better attitude towardsfighting himself, and not being a coward, even in defeat he would have gone down as 1 of the great men in history, but as it stands he was a murderer and a toss

Answer 9

depends on what aspect you want to look at,
superior at causing a lot of problems, yes.
superior at helping mankind, no.

Answer 10

Actually he was, look what he got away with, He was on a mission to weed out the weaklings to strengthen the strain.
If the Russians hadn't of taken him out , The world would be a way different place right now!