2006-12-28 01:26:57 · 10 answers · asked by truce_love_10 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I believe the world is about to experience a hell no one would believe in 2007.
Bush has deployed a Carrier Battle Group to the Persian Gulf. Why? I believe he has every intention of taking out Iran's nuclear facilities.
This battle group is definately in for some major problems, as Iran has the most sophisticated anti-ship missile in the world.
If they decide to use it and i honestly believe they will, our fleet is going to suffer some heavy casualties. We may lose the entire battle group and thousands of naval personnel.
We have nothing in our military arsenal that can stop this missile if they use it against our fleet.
The carrier battle group should arrive in the persian gulf about the same time as Saddam Hussien is executed. Again Bush and his advisors have greatly under-estimated what is about to happen.
The troops on the ground are saying they expect a great increase in violence throughout Iraq once Saddam has been executed. Casualties will definately increase. Moments ago I checked the Department of Defense website, found that 98 troops had been killed so far this month given the daily average of americans killed this month, it will more than likely mean this month will become the third highest month of casualties in irag.
I expect this daily average to increase on a daily basis until we pull our troops out. I think the president should be impeached for getting into this senseless war, and honestly believe he should be hung by the neck right alongside Saddam Hussein.
We've taken our eye off the real problem "Dealing with terrorists", afghanistan is a shambles, the taliban operating everywhere in that country because there isn't enough troops to deal with them. The Taliban have even free reign in a provice of Pakistan. They may have been decimated years ago but they have rebuilt that organization and have expanded into pakistan.
Terrorists will more than likely strike the United States again maybe not under bush's watch but certainly at some future date we will experience a great disasterous attack in this country.
2006-12-28 01:46:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well... perhaps an attack by Iran on Us ships is what is required to have a real war and put an end to this mess.
The reality is that if you are going to change Afganistan and Iraq... you also need to change Iran and Syria.
The problem I have with America is that they go to war without meaning business. They are not fighting a war. It is more like a peace force. I am now thinking that they would have been better off staying home. They have not achieved a darn thing. If they went home now... Iraq would revert to its old way within 12 months.
2006-12-28 02:06:48 · answer #2 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iran makes a lot of claims and threats. Right now the only reason that their front man Al Sadr still has power is because he is remaining in the British sector. Once the British pull out of Iraq then the US and Iraqi forces will be able to take him out (again).
2006-12-28 03:35:05 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He won't have the skill to do something approximately it. as quickly as US troops are long previous, Iraq would be torn to shreds. Sunnis and Shiites would be at each others' throats. Iran will take the Shiites' side, Syria will take the Sunnis' side, and each will finally dominate and administration portion of Iraq. Turkey will invade northern Iraq to do away with Kurdish rebels. finally, Iraq would be as nonexistent a rustic as Lebanon, or worse. something like this might finally take place no be counted how long US troops stay in Iraq.
2016-10-28 13:15:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, let's see.... the longest war of the 20th century was between Iraq and Iran, and historically both countries have a population with long memories and short tempers.
I'm not sure, but it's pretty certain they won't exactly feel liking handing out kittens and sweeties to everyone....
2006-12-28 01:35:55 · answer #5 · answered by InitialDave 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Probably but I don't think the Shia (coreligionists of Iran) are the main problem rather the Sunni are. An exception is Moqtada Al-Sadr's Mehdi Army but they haven't been anywhere near as much trouble as the Sunni insurgency but who knows what could happen.
2006-12-28 01:30:25 · answer #6 · answered by Paranormal I 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iran is training, funding and arming the insurgency in Iraq.
Iran wants to take over,like they did in Lebanon.
2006-12-28 01:58:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iran is a bully and they will soon get an attitude adjustment.
2006-12-28 01:30:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
iraq isnt a real hell already?
2006-12-28 01:32:49 · answer #9 · answered by 2010 CWS Champs! 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They are half of the problem now!
2006-12-28 01:29:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋