Interesting point. Machines can't worship, neither can machines think. Therefore we should realize that we are not machines and start thinking for ourselves. When we do that we just might realize that the supposed mechanic was given the credit for work that was not his.
2006-12-28 00:38:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by ÜFÖ 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
LOVE THE QUESTION DUDE..!!!
The machine worships only the tools that are used upon it and that which is fed into it to keep itself in a state of constant motion.
It tries to remember the Creator and the Mechanic, but after a time it will eventually forget who or what that was.
At some point, following this logic, the machine will declare another as the Creator or might even become so self-aware that it decides that it is the Creator itself.
2006-12-28 00:36:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by wolf560 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Is that referring to a hypothetical creator deity, or the possible fate of humanity after we create the first Von Neumann machines?
There's an old SF tale ("Answer" Frederic Brown, 1954) that concerns a supercomputer, and delivers the punchline "Now, there is a God."
The theological position is that the very fabric of the universe requires God's attention to maintain its existence. The role of universal observer does not, by this reckoning, become redundant.
You know the pair of limericks on a theme by Bishop Berkeley? (Half way down the wiki page below)
So, would we expect our machines to worship us,
or at least respect our wishes and commands ?
Or would we recognise them as our equals and eventually our superiors?
Since we're not placed to make universes, in respect of the God question: if there, then yes, very probably worship would be appropriate. If there.
2006-12-28 01:02:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pedestal 42 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The machine should realize that it owes its existence to The Mechanic, and that one day it will need to return to The Mechanic. Therefore the machine needs to continue a positive relationship with The Mechanic.
2006-12-28 00:32:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Minister 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends. Can the machine even worship? Does it have intelligence? Will it just maintain, or is there a mechanism to evolve and improve?
2006-12-28 00:28:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Machines can't worship. Even people aren't self-maintaining. The second law of thermal dynamics rules all of this out.
2006-12-28 00:29:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by RB 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
considering the fact that we are the programmers of machines machines that replace into conscious might probable be like us in that some are good some are undesirable. additionally, they does no longer in basic terms bypass from being un conscious to thoroughly conscious. they could be like toddler's and toddlers showing activities that are un envisioned and unique. in addition to they might ought to style some style of society in the past they might relatively make any judgements. merely because of the fact a working laptop or laptop is a militia laptop that does no longer propose it is going to wish to combat and merely because of the fact it relatively is a sowing device does no longer propose it won't.
2016-11-24 19:47:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by rigel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you really think you are self-maintaining? The Divine Mechanic is at work in us with every breath we breathe.
2006-12-28 00:31:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mary W 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Worship is not necessary. You've stumbled into the Deism/Pantheism wing of the building.
2006-12-28 00:28:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
All machines have in-built obsolescence. How else would the world go around?
2006-12-28 00:29:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by the7thseal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋