Natural??
Assasin? or murdered?
He invaded Iraq with false reason tht Iraq has weapon of mass destruction.
Resulting killing of lakhs of Innocent Iraqi civilians.
and still going on as on average 50 ppl per day being killed.
2006-12-27 20:10:18 · 25 answers · asked by maak 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
If he stays out of Iraq he will die in bed, or while clearing brush. If he goes to Iraq he will hang, like Saddam.
2006-12-27 20:12:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
He will die naturally.. or close to it.. The fact is, I think most Americans have given up on a democratic government, perhaps they vote, but thats the end of the line for most Americans, and even assassinating the president wont seem to stop the machine... Remember, the VP and president are on the same team so to speak.
I spent over a year in Iraq, a commitment that I choose to take to fruition. However, if you thought for one moment that Saddam, and Osama were allied in any way, you have no one to blame but yourself. It was a known fact at the time that they were in reality bitter enemies.
If evidence were to dictate that president Bush knew there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, I think he should be put to death. The truth of the matter is, Iraq had very few weapons period when we arrived, and people seem to forget that we had airspace access to Iraq since the first golf war.. Perhaps it would be very easy to observe such weapons being moved hidden or produced...
2006-12-27 20:40:14 · answer #2 · answered by natemail00 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Like all other presidents... Of old age.
"Resulting killing of lakhs of Innocent Iraqi civilians.
and still going on as on average 50 ppl per day being killed."
Most of these Iraqis have died by the hands of insurgents bombing markets and mosques, like the holy mosque of the golden dome in Samarra, which was bombed by Sunni insurgents; and not by American forces.
Get your fact straight before you post.
2006-12-28 06:01:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
First the Iraqi civilians are mostly being killed by Islamic militants and Militias. Not Americans. So stop that yourself. It is your people doing it, ***** at them. Second If Saddam never had WMDs what killed all those Kurds and all those Iranian soldiers in your seven year war with them? Chemical weapons are WMDs and since he used them more than once I guess he had them didn't he. Just because I cannot find something does not mean you don't have it. You may have been better at hiding than I am at finding. Saddam murdered Kurds by the thousands, Millions died in his war with Iran, and thousand were killed and raped by Saddam when he invaded Kuwait.
2006-12-27 20:19:00 · answer #4 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam Hussein killed 300,000 of his own people, not counting the people killed in the Iran-Iraq war (closer to a million and a half) and the Kuwait invasion. Bush has a long way to go to catch up to Saddam, and as inconvenient as this is to you he did have approval from the U.N. Security Council. I don't like Bush and I don't like having been misled about the WMD, but "facts is facts" - the U.N. said "go ahead", and so "we" did.
2006-12-27 20:14:57 · answer #5 · answered by Paul H 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There actually was a curse put on the presidents by a Native American Chief [Tecumseh, i think] that any president elected in a year ening with zero would die in office...
This happened to all of the presidents between the time of his curse up until Ronald Reagan
2006-12-27 20:12:38 · answer #6 · answered by thelordnyax 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why Bush but all at UN who firstly approve on the sanction and eventually the war, oh poor...Iraqi. Death from stroke of course.
2006-12-27 20:36:16 · answer #7 · answered by Tan Ah teck 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your'e a complet idiot. President Bush is a good man who is faced with many difficult decisions. Historians will judge Mr. Bush more kindly because Iraq would have succeeded and Iraq will have been a young democracy. Do me a favor and stop the hate and get some counseling you moron.
2006-12-27 21:06:16 · answer #8 · answered by General Vic 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Assasinated by Snipper rifles probarbaly.
2006-12-27 20:19:11 · answer #9 · answered by Shr| 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Probably natural many years from now. But I am halfway surprised that there hasn't been an assassination attempt yet... or if there has been it wasn't obvious enough to be on the news.
2006-12-27 20:12:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Natural, you moron. There was not false reason. Saddam Hussein was claiming that he has WMDs. As far as the killing of the Iraqi citizens, it's not the US Military killing them. IT'S TERRORISTS BLOWING UP CARS AND SUICIDE BOMBERS! You need to get your facts straight.
2006-12-27 20:13:22 · answer #11 · answered by billb_tx 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋