better for who? We are a 1 parent family and it works well for us. The kids are happy and well adjusted. How would they be with two parents? I don't know. It is not something I think about. This works well for us. There is no fighting there is one set of rules and they are happy. This is more than I see in a lot of two parent households
2006-12-27 21:35:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rachel 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I've been a single parent family. It's hard!! WHen a parent is stressed out, so are the kids and this is demonstrated in their behavior.
I am now married, and OMG i feel like a weight has been lifted. My husband is fabulous. I now know why it takes two to make a baby, because it is sooo much easier with two in providing for needs. The kids are better behaved with two in the house because if they wear one parent out, there's a second to step in.
I know that it is not like this in all households, I am very fortunate. I also know that had I remained in relationship with the my child's father.. then it would have been harder than being a single parent. It would have been emotionally draining, phyisically exhausting, and both my children and I would have suffered mental anguish.
It just depends on the two parents involved in the situation.
2006-12-27 22:40:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mckayla M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two parent families is better of course, only in the case in where both parents are putting effort into raising the family. If only one parent of the two are putting effort, then you might as well be a one-parent family.
2006-12-27 19:11:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by justin3067 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that their have been many very successful single parents that have raised great children.
Still it can not be argued that a child benefits most when they have input from both a mother and father. Each parent fulfills different needs that children have.
It really depends on the people. If the dad's a loser, no need for him. If the mom's a psycho, no need for her. Some children are better off with neither of their parents.
2006-12-27 19:19:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sonia 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either is fine. A child will benifit more from a family with both parents but we all don't get that choice. As long as the single parent has good role model for the child to look up to and ask questions that they just can't ask Mom or Dad then I say the child will be just as well as a child with both parents.
2006-12-27 19:11:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Two because man was made for a woman and a woman made for man so that they can come together and raise a family but some impatient ladies ditch their marriage but build 1/2 families. Case of demise of a partner can be understood as an unfortunate situation but a family is made of a father(husband),a mother (wife) and child/children and nothing else. or are two married gay men called a family?
2006-12-27 19:17:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Off hand I would say you are a little nuts for even asking that. However, I know that some children would have been better off never having been born rather than have parents like they have. If one parent is virtually lower than an animal, then a one parent family is better.
2006-12-27 20:04:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tony T 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've got questioned that too. (i'm no longer myself somewhat dedicated to the concept families could have 2 mothers and fathers interior the domicile, whether adoptive or organic and organic.) it may be hypocrisy in the event that they stored the toddler after a divorce-- or for that rely, if one be sure died. however, I nevertheless desire that to working in the direction of what they pontificate... the final ingredient an accompanied and/or bereaved toddler desires is to be tossed into yet yet another domicile. I do wish they had see the irony, although.
2016-10-19 02:04:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
two parent families r definetnly better than one parent families coz....a mom can never equal a dad n a dad can never equal a mom....both influence the life of achild in different ways...and one without the other is quite out of nature's rule...
2006-12-27 19:07:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by deepthi m 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it is best for there to be a mother and a father in raising children - I surely can't provide certain aspects of child-rearing which my husband does, and he cannot do what parts I do. Together, we are raising a well-rounded child.
2006-12-27 21:38:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lydia 7
·
1⤊
0⤋