You got to remember these are the same people that voted for Bill Clinton (twice!). Drunks are dangerous in a car and libs are dangerous in a voting booth. Is it a choice or a disease?
2006-12-27 18:06:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I play in a weekend bar band, and have to put up with this crap all the time. I would rather argue with drunks than cons any day. With cons, it's always "Clinton this" and Clinton that", although Clinton hasn't been President for 6 years. Then it's always "Rush said this" or Rush said that", even though Rush is a big hypocritical drug addict. With drunks, at least all they want you to do is play Louie, Louie all night...
2006-12-27 17:58:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sean T 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Arguing with a drunk is a lot like yelling at a brick wall.
2006-12-27 17:46:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by IMHO 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
every time i try to argue with a drunk , the mirror fogs up.
2006-12-27 22:58:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never. How can you argue with someone who doesn't know what he is talking about. It doesn't make any sense.
2006-12-27 18:06:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by auntsid 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is not a Liberal response, it is a paranoid one, and not all paranoids are Liberals. In fact, they're most often reactionary.
2006-12-27 17:46:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why ? It is like talking to the wall.
2006-12-27 22:49:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by WC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
not the same. and who talks to the mailman? at least i don't.
2006-12-27 17:53:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes and you are 100% right
2006-12-27 19:34:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ya n it was a complete waste of time
2006-12-27 17:47:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by lilski2029 2
·
1⤊
0⤋