English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Wow, the internet is full of morons who seem to believe that the WTC was brought down by specially placed demolition explosives. And that the pentagon wasn't really hit by any airliner at all. What kind of drugs are these people on ?

2006-12-27 15:24:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

10 answers

911 conspiracy theory is full of holes too although those films can be quite compelling. There are just too much 'cherry picking' of facts, interview excerpts... etc. Here's some example how they twist facts to create dramatic 911 stories.

On hijackers found alive 'mystery'......
Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader. This article is used to claim that hijackers are made up/fake people in this ‘conspiracy.’ Yes, it’s sad. They took the story about mistaken identities and turned it into a 'mystery'. These conspiracy gurus didn't finish reading the article nor understand what the article is about.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages. Usually demolition takes almost month of gutting and preparation for much smaller buildings. Twin towers were not taken down with bombs as claim by some. http://www.debunking911.com

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein(WTC7 owner), who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense. So he is part of 'inside job', but felt like revealing on national TV? That's nonsense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary. Lot of stories about gov shooting down flight 93, missile theories...etc seem to have originated from this.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? Some cars were damaged too by the plane grazing over highways.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways and have taken military actions without UN clearance in the past. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Why would so many authorities make bold claims that reveal this so called 'inside job' if it is inside job? As 911 theory people claim. Did Nixon ever go on TV and say 'oh yea I bugged those suckers' before whole thing became public? Lot of 911 theory claims don't make sense. If you have secret plot to bring down buildings and disguise it as terrorism would you tell people about it on TV interviews or in public?

Lot of 911 claims are simply flat out lies and twist facts so hard that they would virtually rewrite dictionary/English context to make their stories. They also never mention of historical events leading to Iraq War 2003. This war was not simply 911 and then we go to war. This war was in the making soon as 91 Iraq War was over. But conspiracy gurus are too cool for world history since they 'know' what government want you to believe.

2006-12-30 11:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sorry - but you can't blame it on drugs. The conspiracy believers are just "special". It seems that whenever anything bad happens these days, these people always come up with a wacked out theory to explain the tragedy.

Just say NO to unfounded conspiracy thepries.

2006-12-27 15:38:13 · answer #2 · answered by Bad M 4 · 0 0

Yeah, the idiot that came up with the "19 saudis who could barely fly small planes smashed four 767s into the towers" conspiracy must've been smoking some damn good dope. I mean, the idea that jet fuel could melt steel, or that WTC 7 fell because "the towers fell on it", or that our fighter planes moving at speeds in excess of Mach 2 couldn't possibly have caught up to commercial jets only 10 minutes away..it's entirely preposterous, don't you agree? I think we should take away the cocaine from these silly conspirators, they're going to make themselves crazy.

2006-12-27 16:02:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i replaced into 19 while it happened. My mom woke me as much as tell me with reference to the 1st tower being hit. at first i presumed it replaced into an twist of destiny, till the newspeople have been speaking with reference to the possibility of a planned terrorist attack. i replaced into interior the bathe while my mom got here working in saying a airplane hit the 2nd tower. yet another memory I even have of that morning (oddly) replaced into listening to on the information some bomb going off on the State branch, which grew to become out to be fake. i'm uncertain why that caught in my head. something of the day replaced right into a blur for me. I in basic terms could no longer understand something like that taking place. I mean, all of us knew something replaced into finally going to happen to our united states of america, yet we in no way envisioned it to surely happen. I undergo in suggestions being very drained and emotionally wiped out that day.

2016-10-19 01:54:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No, it's not you.. those people are on the same drugs that people who say that the Holocaust never occurred are on...This is America and you have to allow them their opinion, even if it is sick and perverted......They want to cause upset with their sophomoric little theories, so don't give them the satisfaction of it and ignore the fools.....

2006-12-27 15:32:22 · answer #5 · answered by dave.whatever 2 · 2 1

I don't use drugs or condone the government allowing them to enter the states but guess what they did!
You say it wasn't a conspiracy, prove it!
How many more of our soldiers have to die for land, please the war started to find Osama Bin Laden or are you on drugs and forgot?

2006-12-27 15:36:22 · answer #6 · answered by feast52000 2 · 1 1

It's just you. 9/11 was definitely a conspiracy. The question is who's involved in the conspiracy. Who stands to gain? Who benefits? That is the question.

2006-12-27 15:31:37 · answer #7 · answered by Maurice P 2 · 1 3

/sarcasm on/ yes, and pearl harbor was an inside job too. /sarcasm off/

the most I'll give is... is it possible that it was an inside job? yeah. probable? no.

2006-12-27 15:44:49 · answer #8 · answered by serious troll 6 · 0 0

The question should be what kind of anti hallucinogenics should they be placed on?

2006-12-27 15:27:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Even the Blind can feel the sun although they cannot see it.

2006-12-28 16:20:29 · answer #10 · answered by Genuis by Design 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers