No stories about it, just Sex,and age.
With all this going on about underage sex, I am wondering just what is the average age and if you wish to add it, what YOU think should be the age of consent.
2006-12-27 13:38:22 · 31 answers · asked by Common Sense 5 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Age of consent is idiotic. It's another instance of bringing the government into the bedroom. Kids are mature enough to have sex at age 16, if taught to be responsible and properly use birth control. I would argue that 16-year-olds are more intelligent than our police force and politicians and the president himself and "know what they're doing" enough to decide whether they want to have sex or not. Kids are not braindead until they turn 18 and can suddenly comprehend things. Parents and conservative religion instill an irrational fear of sex in their children and it isn't right; girls are taught that they're not even supposed to _enjoy_ sex. They are taught that they will encounter sex in only three contexts: as violence, as personal morality (sin), and as reproduction. But sex is a normal human desire and everyone should be entitled to enjoy it responsibly, even (and especially) women. I lost mine at 17 (a month from 18). Anyway, I am regardless glad that I waited 'til after I graduated high school.
I think it's something that a person needs to get out of his/her system. Sex can become a distraction from more important things (college, especially) when it's all s/he wants to think about and is still at the point where s/he considers sex some transcendent, enchanted thing. It is, unfortunately, neither transcendent nor enchanted. It's about as human as it gets.
2006-12-27 13:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I was 16-1/2 and he was 17
2006-12-27 13:40:26 · answer #2 · answered by Jay Jay 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No 13-14 years previous isn't a useful age to lose your virginity. it somewhat is greater useful to maintain it for the destiny once you get married. Your husband/spouse could manage you lots greater useful, they had sense greater happy and pay you with greater appreciate. 13-14 years isn't something. in case you have been a woman, what if to procure pregnant? WHAT IF? I mean, the possibilities are high extremely extreme in case you're no longer on beginning administration or something. And plus, do you think approximately the outcomes? some toddlers do in basic terms no longer care, and what outcomes? nicely, something no longer friendly. in case you're asking this, you're no longer waiting for it, you're no longer waiting to stand the outcomes. i'm sixteen, and that i've got not lost it yet, and not going to each time quickly. in case you grow to be pregnant, what are you going to do? I mean heavily, end college? it somewhat is going to ruin your existence. 13-14 is definitely no longer the suited time. Too youthful. Too risky. Too immature.
2016-10-19 01:46:19 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Male 14
2006-12-27 13:42:01 · answer #4 · answered by zen522 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
100
2006-12-27 13:40:46 · answer #5 · answered by nelson 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I was 19 and he was 20. Out of high school
2006-12-27 14:16:46 · answer #6 · answered by Hey Girl 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Male....14
2006-12-27 13:40:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I WAS 17
2006-12-27 14:10:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was 17, he was 18.
That was 20 years ago.
2006-12-27 13:41:12 · answer #9 · answered by FunBetty! 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
18/m
2006-12-27 13:40:44 · answer #10 · answered by Interested 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋