the child growing in her, nothing is wrong with that? and for those answers that say well it was her choice, its not like the baby inside can think or breathe and is totally dependent on the mother but at some point you were a fetus growing inside your mother and she decided to raise you and keep you alive. You grew up from a fetus and turned into a fully functional and wise person. There are no longer children in America because of the inconvenience. We have no future without children because they are the future. Schools are becoming smaller and less things are able to get done like after school activities because class sizes are getting smaller. It sucks that because a 17 year old girl slept with her boyfriend and got pregnant she isnt mature or ready to have a baby, but she must have learned somewhere in her life that sex=possible baby. so if she was mature enough to have sex with her boyfriend she must have been mature enough to keep her baby. ok im done now. thankyou God Bless!!!
2006-12-27 12:20:21 · 13 answers · asked by cheesesticks320 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Other - Pregnancy & Parenting
It depends on how far along in her pregnancy when she was murderd. Women don't have abortions at the 8 or nine month mark, but if they are murdered at 8 or 9 months along in their pregnancy I would consider it a double homicide. And I cannot stand pro life preachers. I would like to see YOU adopt all of the unwanted "babies" that would be saved if aborotion became illegal!!!!! I think that a women has every right to choose.
2006-12-27 12:26:40 · answer #1 · answered by Easter Bunny 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's not considered a double homicide unless the child was viable outside the womb. The criminal courts operate under the same laws as the abortion doctors do. It's illegal to abort a fetus past a certain date and that is also the date in the pregnancy at which if the woman were to be killed it would have been a double homocide. Don't rant about things who aren't truly educated about.
2006-12-27 13:37:13 · answer #2 · answered by evilangelfaery919 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
JUDGE NOT LEST YE BE JUDGED.
You really should get facts together before you open such a heated debate. Do you know the percentage of children living in poverty & single parent homes? TOO MANY!! What about child abuse issues? Dead beat dads? Welfare recipients? I won't even go into how many kids received gifts from Toys for Tots. All of it.... I understand that there are MANY ways to prevent this, but the fact is-it happens. People need to be out there pushing preventative measures more, not arguing this issue. If everyone adopted a baby or helped to financially support those children that they are arguing about I bet the argument would change. You hear much about this, but you don't hear offers to to help with the baby or to adopt it.
And the current population is approximately 300,000,000!
As far as being mature enough to care for a child if your "mature" enough to have sex..... WHOLE other topic of discussion!
2006-12-27 12:37:47 · answer #3 · answered by cowgirlkolbie 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where I live it is not a double homicide when a pregnant woman is killed. A fetus has no rights under the law. So that part of your question isn't true for all places.
Two school classes are becoming larger each year because of budget cutbacks. That part of your question certainly doesn't apply to where I live either.
Three it is wrong to force a person to undergo medical treatment for the benefit of another. You can not be forced to take tests, or donate blood or an organ against your will, why should it be ok to force a woman to be pregnant, and give birth and undergo all the risks inherant in that? There are almost no risks to giving blood and yet we aren't compelled to do that, and it would save lives.
2006-12-27 12:31:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
do you really think that it is a smart thing to do to have a baby when you can not take care of it.. at the beginning it is cells not a baby. It is a double homicide because it was a killing look up the word abortion
2006-12-27 12:39:42 · answer #5 · answered by Irie 123 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
as i can agree with your point and agree that if someone is old enough to have sex then they are old enough to pay the consequences because nowadays there is no excuse for lack of protection or ignorance but your argument is not a good one. class sizes are not getting smaller and the world is completely overpopulated.
2006-12-27 12:32:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
IT's considerd a doulbe homicide because the pregnant girl, lady or w/e is carrying a baby in them with is a human and when she dies the baby usualy dies with her
2006-12-27 12:24:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is true the world is kind of twisted. It is like a double negative
2006-12-27 12:29:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i can't tell you a goos answer but i think if the woman was good enough to spread her legs then she should be capable of taking care of it too
otherwise she needs it sewn up
2006-12-27 12:32:57 · answer #9 · answered by LIZ 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'ts called a double standard.
2006-12-27 12:31:35 · answer #10 · answered by Paul S 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋