Ask your financial accountant, not a bunch of teenagers on YA.
2006-12-27 12:08:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by Plasmapuppy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I assume you mean disbursals for yourself as the owner of the S Corporation.
You pay yourself just as a regular employee. If you need comparables, you can check out salary.com. You should also make a distribution out of your AAA account to help cover the taxes on the total income from the S Corp. Just write yourself a check for whatever you want, and debit your retained earnings account for that distribution.
Make sure you keep documentation on the distribution in case of an audit.
2006-12-27 13:18:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by texascajun82 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As a teenager on Yahoo, I would recommend distributing the year end salary in sufficient amount that there is no taxable income left in the corporation if you are in a state that taxes S corporations. If not, consider minimizing the salary and distributing enough to pay taxes, but make sure you distribute pro rata as S corporations cannot have dividend preferences. By minimizing salary, you reduce employment taxes for the corporation.
2006-12-27 12:36:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by mattapan26 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Tax Auditor for the State of California and a comment above hit it on the head. Make sure you determine a salary that is substantial/reasonable for your officers depending on their duties and services provided to the corporation. Even though its and S-corp its still a corporation and the owners cannot take draws our as freely as a partnership or sole prop.
2006-12-27 17:19:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by whoda19 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Per the IRS, you must pay yourself a "reasonable" salary. What "reasonable" is a matter of circumstance. As a general rule of thumb, the salary you draw should be comparable to what it would cost you to hire someone from the outside to do the work.
The salaries paid to S-Corp officers/owners is a major focus of the IRS.
2006-12-27 14:46:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wayne Z 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's under a million/3 of her income (in case you do no longer count form all of the bonuses she gets from pastime communities and companies that are in mattress with the government as money that she has). in basic terms so which you already know. yet then, $fifty 8,000 is greater desirable than an conventional person's each year income. that's a ludicrous quantity of money spent - money no longer earned via contribution to society. She did it by using fact she concept it may be exciting and relaxing. Now if she have been a business employer proprietor who have been given wealthy the authentic way, then i could have not have been given any quarrel with it. yet that's no longer her money, and it won't be paying for holiday time - she already gets sufficient as is! Congress would not meet the conventional 50 weeks out of the 12 months that folk paintings, no longer even somewhat close! people, please study my answer till now you cost it. i'm attempting to bash Pelosi harder than you adult adult males are, all of the on an identical time as status up for honorable people who happen to be wealthy.
2016-10-19 01:41:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by scharber 4
·
0⤊
0⤋