When the life of life,being of being,existence of existence,intelligence of intelligence began the process ?

Question

What do you imagine it must of looked like?
As for me I imagine that it must have looked something like what evolutionists say evolution looked like,a graduated forming and growth, but only much faster.The Universe developed and everything in it, like a seed in a womb, as Genesis describes, undistinct at first, without form or beauty, no shape or defined features , then in a process like the the growth of the seed in the womb into a defined full featured creation, it became as it is now. Evolutionists are people who say it has no father or mother, so they are believers in virgin birth as well. They say the seed just got itself together and grew withot being contributed to by an outside agent(Father,Parent) So don't let them tell you they don't allow miracles,evolution requires a bigger miracle than a Creation ever could, because Creation has a rational cause a parent, evolution is a virgin birth. But that is beside the point.
Opinions?

JP, yeah ok.

Om, I can accept that as a sort of naturalised view of God, I do think God perhaps is like a universe, but especially His mind which begets things.the bible says God creates through logos, his mind or words, perhaps we are thought s of God
The scripture also says in him we live and move and hav eour being, I have alwaysd found that to be a mind excercising expression. Interesting response.

Answer 1

For something to have a father, it has to be alive. The universe is not alive (though it contains living entities). If you want to go by pasteur's law of biogenesis (which creationists swear by as apparentyl it disproves evolution), then like gives birth to like. I.e. in your theory, god is a slightly older, bigger universe.

To add details, this may not actually be as crazy as it souns, there was an article in New Scientist (weekly scientific magazine) about how it is possibe for us to create our own universes in particle accelerators, which sort of detach from our own spacetime and begin to form their own. We could be made in the particle accelerator of a different universe.

Answer 2

Firstly, evolution has nothing to do with Big Bang theory, they are completely different studies altogether.

Secondly, you're comparing a biological process to an completely inorganic process and a theological entity (apparently a non-miraculous one according to you) to an apparent cosmological miracle.

Okay, so you don't "get" evolution or the big bang. That doesn't mean you can twist it to represent how you think it has to be some sort of a miracle for it to be true.

I suppose you think that people who "believe in" mitosis and meiosis believe in virgin births as well...

Answer 3

Miracle? We can describe every naturalistic process necessary. And sexual reproduction started quite a long time after the beginning of life. The first life was asexual.

So, looks like you need to do a little more research before you make a fool of yourself like this.

Answer 4

Evolution is, always has been, always will be. Nothing "created" anything. It was all in the Big Bang.

Answer 5

Pardon me?

Answer 6

You're stuttering!