Alot of illegal activist from mexico claim that mexicans should have free rome of North & South America because their Indian. Even though most of Mexico is of Mixed Black, European and Native American blood. The issue is about U.S. soverignty, and nothing less.
2006-12-27 11:53:26 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I think they would get scalped.
In all honesty.. I wish people would quit trying to come into our country and force THEIR language and lifestyles down our throats. If they love their language and lifestyles and culture so much, they need to go back to it.
I am not a mean person, but some common sense and pride is needed here! We are AMERICA! Not Mexico, not the middle east, not ...whatever.
2006-12-27 12:03:07 · answer #1 · answered by jamocha 2 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Okay, well first, alot should be two words, a lot, activist should be plural, it's roam, not rome, it's they're, not their and finally, it's spelled sovereignty. So, anyway, the being Indian argument confuses me because that would be like me saying I have Danish blood in me, so because Sweden is a neighbor to Denmark, I should be allowed to be a citizen of Sweden. A person is allowed into this country because he was born here, not because of who his ancestors were. But, given that argument, these "illegal activists from Mexico" would have a better argument by saying that North and South America were all one country before Europeans invaded it and broke it up and when the Mexican and Indian peoples exclusively lived here and, as such, the Europeans who now call themselves white Americans should have to ask for permission to be here from the Indians and Mexicans. I am also confused why you claim this is about U.S. sovereignty when you say it is illegal Mexican activists who are making this claim.
2006-12-27 12:10:45 · answer #2 · answered by Venice Girl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Now that's funny. Just another way Aztec(mexican) and Cherokee (US) of the Aztecs demanding rights. I'd bet the farm the Cherokee's would hook up with the Apache's, slaughter the Aztecs and then open up Indian casinos
2006-12-27 11:58:52 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
like the "Early human beings" (settlers) - diverse indian tribes killed one yet another by way of cultural and language limitations, out of worry for his or her lives or basically undeniable lack of understanding. The Nahuatl languages are concerning to the different Uto-Aztecan languages spoken with the help of peoples which includes the Hopi, Comanche, Paiute and Ute, Pima, Shoshone, Tarahumara, Yaqui, Tepehuán, Huichol and different peoples of western North u . s . a .. all of them belong to the Uto-Aztecan linguistic kin that's between the most important and very best studied language households of the Americas at the same time with a minimum of sixty one man or woman languages, and spoken from the U. S. to El Salvador. that is a grouping on the same order as Indo-eu. that is likewise a widely held conception that the Aztec migrated decrease to and fro to North & South u . s . a . beforehand settling in Mexico.
2016-12-01 05:58:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, your question is so stupid, and you ask it so proudly. How can someone compare Mexico and US with Aztecs and Cherokees? I used though that Mexico and US are civilized countries. And are Mexicans Aztecs? Are yanks Cherokees? Mexicans are not demanding you to speak Spanish, you speak if you want. And why people like YOU keep blaming Mexicans that are trying to improve their lifes, instead of blaming the government that does nothing to stop them? Blame the weaker, of course, it's easier, blame the foreigner, of course, it's easy.
2006-12-28 07:34:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
bull crap. they have nothing but Mexican Indian in them. if they moved in on the Cherokee Indians they would get their as ses killed. you don't mess with the native Americans and think you will get away with it. leave them alone. they have suffered enough.
by the way the Aztec Indians was animals. they killed their own people off. so there fore the Mexicans have Aztec blood in them. it is in there blood to kill. no to illegals.
2006-12-27 12:53:42 · answer #6 · answered by loretta 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
you want to talk about racism, well lets talk about racism.have you ever noticed that most of the mexicans that are in the USA legally or illegally are of aztec descent,and the wealthy leaders who run mexico are of spanish descent.the mexican government is sending their race problem to the USA and we still ha vent come to terms with our own racial issues.its the rich white mans disease syndrome but I'm a poor white man just trying to survive and you dam mexicans and the rich white butt heads who are allowing this crap to escalate think I'm going down without a fight you are dead wrong and i emphasis the word dead.PROTEST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION 5/5/07 ALL ACROSS AMERICA!
2006-12-27 12:47:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Aztecs would slaughter all them little Indian tribes.
2013-12-14 04:45:24 · answer #8 · answered by Eduardo 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Cherokee wouldn't understand Spanish! Seriously, though, most of the Hispanic people from south of the border I know speak English pretty well. None of them have asked me to learn Spanish. When I say something to them in Spanish they usually answer in English! The kooks you see on TV who say everyone should speak Spanish are exceptions to the rule, who are shown on TV because they make people mad and, thus, keep them watching long enough to get hypnotized by commercials; that's why they have them on. They don't represent the average Hispanic immigrant.
2006-12-27 12:09:13 · answer #9 · answered by Wrath Warbone 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The Cherokees would kick some Aztec ***. we all know that Cherokees (and all the Jeep line) dont take Sh*t from no one.
2006-12-27 13:30:20 · answer #10 · answered by Matias G 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋