English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The two lenses I'm looking into for my digital camera (Nikon D50) are

70-300 mm DI f/4-5.6 Digital Series AF Zoom Lens

70-210 mm f/4.5-5.6 high speed AF Lens

The main reason I am considering the second one, is it's slightly cheaper. I was wondering if there was a benefit of it being high speed.

2006-12-27 07:19:08 · 6 answers · asked by april_hwth 4 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

They are both Quantaray made for Nikon

http://www.wolfcamera.com/product/251666095.htm

http://www.wolfcamera.com/product/251664264.htm

2006-12-27 07:44:01 · update #1

6 answers

These lenses are very similar. The only difference I perceive is the zoom and macro capability. These are 2 pluses. Macro allows more detail of an object, so if you want to take extreme close ups of say a flower or skin, macro would be ideal.
Considering the slight price diff. I would go with the 70-300 mm. A lens is one of the most important aspects of your photograph! I see you are looking @ Wolf Camera, a more knowledgeable dealer is Calumet photo, there prices are almost always better and you can ask a ton of q's . Here is the link, happy hunting!

http://www.calumetphoto.com/

2006-12-27 11:04:43 · answer #1 · answered by leslie 6 · 0 0

The f numbers tell you the speed of the lens. You have two similar lense with different focal lengths. The f4-5.6 is the faster of the two at the 70mm position, however fully extended, they have the same speed, it seems, but for longer zooms, the 5.6 70-300 is faster than the other lens.

Aside from the focal lengths, I would tell you that it does not make a lot of difference, the faster of the two is only 1/2 stop faster, or less.

Secondly, I simply do not like Quantaray lenses. In my opinion that are a cheap aftermarket piece of glass and wolf puts them on the Nikons and Canons for the sole purpose of profit for the sale. Therefore they can tell you that the lense are equal to the Canon or Nikon and make more money from the sale.

For aftermarket lenses, I like Vivitar. I have a Sigma, but don't like it all that much, the rest of my lenses are made by the camera manufacturer (Olympus).

You don't have to buy lenses from Wolf, you can buy them from www.keh.com, used, but in like new condition and save money getting the best for your dollar.

High speed in this case means that you can take the picture with less light, but if 4-5.6 will work, so will 4.5-5.6.

2006-12-28 01:23:52 · answer #2 · answered by Polyhistor 7 · 0 0

A fast lens takes in more light so that it can create proper exposure more quickly. Judging by the specs, I would say the 70-300 was faster (5.6/300 vs 5.6/210).

Maybe they are talking about the speed of the autofocus?

2006-12-27 07:24:29 · answer #3 · answered by Automation Wizard 6 · 1 0

confident you could by employing the AF-S lenses in case you pick for to apply your lenses in the vehicle-concentration mode with your get right of entry to point digicam The Nikkor AF-S lenses are all incredibly quickly vehicle-focusing lenses. At time is going by employing, you will see further and extra AF-S lenses changing the older AF lenses. in case you pick for to maintain some money and don't concepts manually focusing your lenses employing the D3000 digicam, you ought to purchase any of the Nikkor AF lenses

2016-10-06 02:09:27 · answer #4 · answered by wheelwright 4 · 0 0

It sounds like you are comparing two different brands of lenses - not Nikon either.

The term "high speed" USUALLY refers to the aperture, but in this case, I am pretty sure it is the manufacturers' claim about focus speed.

If you have two specific lenses in mind, please "add details" or post a new question and tell us ALL the details, especially the brand, and we will be better able to help you.

2006-12-27 07:41:14 · answer #5 · answered by Picture Taker 7 · 0 1

The more expensive one is fastest and best

2006-12-27 07:38:20 · answer #6 · answered by beauxPatrick 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers