What is going on with the writings of Judas?

Question

The last I heard people were still trying to decide if the writings were actually by Judas and if the dates corresponded. Can anyone tell me what the latest news is? I can't seem to find much on the internet and I participate in any religions, so I'm running out of sources of info on the subject. I'm not asking the question to start debates or upset people, I'm just wondering from a scientific point of view what has been decided on those writings that were found.

Answer 1

The Judas fragments included four minute pieces of papyrus and a small bit of the book's leather binding with a piece of attached papyrus page.

No part of the ancient script was altered or damaged during this process.

The results allowed lab experts to confidently date the papyruses to between A.D. 220 and 340.

"The calibrated ages of the papyrus and leather samples are tightly clustered and place the age of the Codices within the third or fourth centuries A.D.," reported Tim Jull, director of Arizona's AMS facility, and research scientist Greg Hodgins.

The Judas papyruses responded to MSI in much the same way that confirmed ancient papyruses have.

Ink samples were also subjected to the MSI. They displayed similar characteristics to those of ancient iron-gall or carbon-based inks from the third or fourth century.

The ink sample that was tested contained two corrections that were subjected to particular scrutiny under the MSI test. The inks used to pen these corrections were also found to be consistent with third- or fourth-century A.D. inks. In addition, the corrections appear to have been made soon after the original was completed.

Like the other evidence, physical and contextual, the MSI results reveal what appears to be an authentic Egyptian document from the third- or fourth-century A.D.

Stephen Emmel, professor of Coptic studies at Germany's University of Munster, analyzed the Gospel of Judas and submitted the following assessment.

"The kind of writing reminds me very much of the Nag 'Hammadi codices," he wrote, referring to a famed collection of ancient manuscripts.

"It's not identical script with any of them. But it's a similar type of script, and since we date the Nag 'Hammadi codices to roughly the second half of the fourth century or the first part of the fifth century, my immediate inclination would be to say that the Gospel of Judas was written by a scribe in that same period, let's say around the year 400."

Answer 2

the invention of a in the past lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot has electrified the Christian community. What Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John let us know approximately Judas, the disciple who betrayed Jesus, is inconsistent and biased. as a result, the revelation of an historic gospel that portrays this despised guy as somebody who observed his function interior the keenness of Christ as critical to an more advantageous plan -- a divine plan -- brings new readability to the previous tale. If Judas had no longer betrayed Jesus, Jesus does no longer have been surpassed over to the government, crucified, buried, and raised from the lifeless. ought to or no longer this is that without Judas, the Easter miracle could by no skill have befell? interior the secrets and strategies of Judas, James M. Robinson, an authority historian of early Christianity, examines the Bible and different historic texts and nicely-knownshows what we are in a position to and can't know with regard to the existence of the historic Judas, his function in Jesus's crucifixion, and despite if the Christian church ought to reevaluate his intentions and available innocence. Robinson tells the sensational tale of the invention of a gospel attributed to Judas, and shows how this impacts Judas's newfound meaning for historic previous and for the Christian faith.

Answer 3

The writings that you are referring to are of the Gnostic Gospels. The Gnostics (Gnosis meaning "Knowledge") were a Christian sect of Egypt in early Christianity....dating to around 300 AD.

The Gospels were written in Coptic and tell the story of a totally and completely different Jesus than the Bible talks about. The Gnostic Gospels are not considered scripture for many reasons.

First, the 4 Gospels of the New Testement - Luke, John, Mark and Matthew were written by those 4 people. The Gnostic Gospels of Mary Magdelene, Judas, Thomas, Phillip, etc. were written in Coptic by the Gnositcs in the 2nd to 4th century. They named these Gospels after Thomas, Phillip, etc in order to give them biblical credibility.

Other reasons that they are not considered of divine inspiration is b/c these books consider the God of the old testement and EVIL God and that the God of the New Testement to be a GOOD God.

The Bible says that the God of the Old and New Test are one and the same.

These Gnostic Gospels were the basis of which Dan Brown wrote his book "The DaVinci Code". Email me if you have any questions.

Answer 4

The Gospel of Judas is a forgery written by the Gnostic's in the first century to discredit the early Christian Church. No believer will accept it as authentic because it makes Jesus out to be just a man and a conspirator against God. the manuscript is a heresy and blasphemes the Holy Spirit.

Answer 5

The Judas writings are Gnostic or Lost Books..these books are "added knowledge", just like the Talmud!...They are not consistent with the rest of the Bible for Old or New Testaments... See Revelation 22

Answer 6

There can be no scientific point of view regarding the writings. It isn't science. I heard that Judas stopped writing these letters long ago.

Answer 7

Check out National Geographic about this. Nobody knows yet when it was written, but it existed in 170 CE as it is specifically mentioned in the writings of St. Irenaeus.
If you are an archeology buff, it's pretty interesting....
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/lostgospel/_pdf/GospelofJudas.pdf?

Hope that link works.

Answer 8

Any writings are by definition written after the fact. Our earliest new testament manuscripsts are copies dated around AD 300.

This would take to long to answer. You sound like one of those people who believe that the apostles Mark, Mathew Luke and John actually wrote their gospels, something no serious biblical scholar actually espouses.

Answer 9

It just more propaganda to undermine Christianity like the Da Vinci Code. It's unfortunate that some people believe this stuff.

Answer 10

isn't that a hoot?

it's like the Council of Nicaea 325-AD, all over again.

only funnier.

fact is -- it's ALL nonsense. funny how they pick and choose...

there is not ONE sigle scriptural writing that can actually be verified back to a gospel. not one. but, by saying it is, it made it so! neat how THAT works, isn't it?