During the Civil War which side treated prisoners of war more humanely?

Answer 1

Both sides were known for their mistreatment of prisoners. In the end, however, the South was unable to feed its army, let alone the thousands of Union troops in captivity. The Northern blockade coupled with Sherman splitting the South in two, played havoc on anyone living in the South towards the end of the war, whether they were civilian, slave, or prisoner.

In this context, it is strange that the inhumane treatment of Southern prisoners by their Northern captors. The Union was a virtual breadbasket, but the prisoners never saw it. So much for being for human rights.

Answer 2

It looks like a lot of people here of heard of the POW camp run by the Confederates but not one has mentioned a notorious camp run by the Union. It was Camp Douglas near Chicago. Conditions were horrible and it is reported that 1 in 5 prisoners within those walls died. Punishment by officials and guards was unusually cruel. Confederate soldiers starved to death as food rations were withheld and many, being deprived of blankets while living in tents, froze to death in the severe weather.

Union soldiers died at Andersonville largely because the Confederates didn't have anything better to provide. Confederates died at Camp Douglas because the Union commander was flat out cruel.

Answer 3

the North was brutal, as was the South.

The South ran out of resources, which partially explains the Andersonville debacle. It's tough to feed prisoners when you can't feed your soldiers and citizens.

Therefore, the answer is that the North was more humane, but not because they were better people, or had better intentions, but because they still had food.

Answer 4

Both sides treated their prisoners poorly. However the north provided better in the long run.

Answer 5

formally, Kentucky grew to become into on the Union area. various Kentuckians fought for the Confederacy, yet extra for the Union. President Abraham Lincoln properly seen getting the considerable of Kentucky in his pocket mandatory to having the flexibility to invade and triumph over the South. via accident the two President Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis have been born in Kentucky. there have been 11 expert accomplice states, yet Kentucky grew to become into no longer one. Many battles have been fought there, Perryville grew to become into in all probability the main extreme.

Answer 6

The North, by far. The south had no resources to even treat their troops well- and POWs were second to them. the North had many resources and was able to treat their prisoners much better (still not good, but as good as they could do.)

Answer 7

The North. Check out a movie called Andersonville .It portrays life in a Southern P.O.W. camp. This place was about as bad as The Hanoi Hilton

Answer 8

Well, I'd have to say the North, seeing as how the South would already have a pretty sad record of having split a nation and fought and killed their own countrymen for the right to continue to enslave an entire race of people because of their skin color. It was also regular practice to hang or lynch Black soldiers that were caught or wounded during a battle as spies or 'traitors' without the benefit of a trial, so take it from there...

Answer 9

It was war -- both sides treated their prisoners inhumanely but the Confederates took it to a whole new level....ever heard of the book "Andersonville" ?

It will open your eyes......

Answer 10

obviously the North...the South treated prisoners about the same as they treated their slaves. The North was fight FOR human rights.