2006-12-26 13:45:09 · 11 answers · asked by STFU Dude 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Substitutionary atonement is a doctrine that dates to the 11th century (Anselm of Canterbury).
2006-12-26 13:48:22 · answer #1 · answered by NONAME 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No you could't genetically engineer a new child's gender. yet, a new child could be genetically changed. In the two drugs and technological awareness, those have 2 diverse meanings, definitions and strategies. think of cloning vs trans-gender, respectively. even nonetheless, there are scientific tactics already in life the place mothers and fathers can preselect the gender of their toddlers. this is costly and distinctive extreme profile human beings chosen this function the place sperm are chosen to fertilize eggs and placed in the womb, otherwise ordinary as invetrofertilization or ivf.
2016-10-06 01:33:14 · answer #2 · answered by vishvanath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is just no way we can even begin to think on God's level you are smaller than an atom to Him. You can't expect a single atom to comprehend the amazing things of this world. We cannot even understand the physical things of this world, how can we understand the spiritual?
God did not engineer a species, He created man in His image, and I am not holy enough to understand His image or holiness as He does. None of mine would be worthy to pay the price even for their own sin.
2006-12-26 13:59:55 · answer #3 · answered by Bre 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe that we were genetically engineered to sin. Rather, we were created with the freedom to live as we saw fit, either submitting to the authority of our Creator, or rebelling against Him.
2006-12-26 13:54:28 · answer #4 · answered by kpax 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not even if you fetish their brains with anhilin. This is not true, engineering does not involve prejudice or risponsability, if someone does create a species with disorders, it will change to fit its need and space, if it does not change or it is not suited for its endeavour, it shall die or be served as misfit, thus aiding not the engineer and setting his liver ablaze for murder and guilt, just a little to compensate for nature itself.
2006-12-26 14:01:17 · answer #5 · answered by Manny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you are making up you hypothesis on no solid basis.
How do you know that we are Genetically programmed to sin???
Then why to kill Child for relieve of sin?
from where you get these information that we have to kill to get free of our sin????
Well I think we need to build our believes on solid basis, otherwise it will be kayos.
2006-12-26 14:37:14 · answer #6 · answered by zajil 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If I loved that species and if they voluntarily chose to sin and my child's death could save them and bring them back to me then yes. My child would only have to be dead 3 days and we would all be a happy family again one day.
2006-12-26 13:53:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If I loved my creation so much that I needed to prove to them that I loved them so! yes!
Plus, I get my son right back after he more than earns his kingship. cool!
2006-12-26 13:58:54 · answer #8 · answered by ConstElation 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yoda said it best.
2006-12-26 13:54:24 · answer #9 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well that's what christians think anyway. However, reality has never been their strong suit...
2006-12-26 13:48:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋