God made everything.....just that simple.
2006-12-26 09:12:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by tas211 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
When you see a building you know there was a builder why? Because the building is evidence someone built it. When you see a painting you know there was a painter because the existence of the painting is proof there was a painter. A painting cannot paint itself anymore than a building can build itself.
Dismantling your watch and placing it in a box then shaking it hundreds of times or even thousands of times will never make a watch, you must carefully place each piece together to make the watch. If a simple watch cannot be made by chance why would we even consider something as intricate as the human body being made by chance?
Romans chapter 1 tells us that the things created, the things we see in nature are proof that an intelligent being created them and this leaves us without excuse knowing there is a God. We can know there is a God by nature itself.
One last note....
The Book of Genesis tells us that everything was created by God—nothing "evolved." Every creature was given the ability to reproduce after its own kind as is stated ten times in Genesis. Dogs do not produce cats. Neither do cats and dogs have a common ancestry. Dogs began as dogs and are still dogs. They vary in species from Chihuahuas to Saint Bernards, but you will not find a "dat" or a "cog" (part cat/dog) throughout God’s creation. Frogs don’t reproduce oysters, cows don’t have lambs, and pregnant pigs don’t give birth to rabbits. God made monkeys as monkeys, and man as man.
Each creature brings forth after its own kind. That’s no theory; that’s a fact. Why then should we believe that man comes from another species? If evolution is true, then it is proof that the Bible is false. However, the whole of creation stands in contradiction to the theory of evolution.
Dr. Kent Hovind of Florida has a standing offer of $250,000 to "anyone who can give any empirical evidence (scientific proof) for evolution." Evolution— true science fiction. His website is www.drdino.com.
2006-12-26 18:04:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by mcoop35 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
The answer is simple: If you believe there is an "intelligent designer", then in fact you have no answer at all, because the next question automatically would be "where did this designer come from? Did it come to exist by itself or was there a super-designer who made the designer?" And so on. Where does that get you? Nowhere. This is the biggest contradiction of them all, and therefore this question is suppressed in most cases.
2006-12-26 17:18:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by NaturalBornKieler 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
All by itself. I hope you are all planning to shut up when science manages to duplicate it in the next few years. And that has NOTHING to do with evolution. Evolution only is about how life changes once it starts.
You really need to start with the fossils if you want to have a competing theory. They clearly start simple and get more complex over time. Any valid theory has to explain this simple to understand fact. Creationism doesn't. The Bible doesn't even have the order right.
2006-12-26 17:16:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Alex 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
True science does not contradict the Bible. God had already warned us long time ago that we should not put our trust in nobles or in the son of an earthling man. (Psalms 146:3)
God has no beginning, because of His will everything came to existance (the universe, planets, lives on earth, etc...). This is what Jehovah had said, "...Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none. I-I am Jehovah, and besides me there is no savior." (Isaiah 43:10, 11)
2006-12-26 18:29:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by My2Cents 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd be really interested to see a list of prominant scientists who do not believe in evolution. What books have you read on the subject? Do you care to share the contradictions with us? Please illuminate us with your scientific insights. Frankly, you cannot spell, puctunctuate or use tenses corectly. I fail to believe that you are educated enough to read scientific documentation.
2006-12-26 17:40:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the only logical conclusion is that there is a Designer who created everything. Evolution is the biggest fairy tale out there. The only explanation anti-theists have is "give anything enough time and anything is possible!" hogwash! it's just a cop out to deny personal responsibility to anything higher than humanity. I'd have a huge problem with evolution even if i didn't believe in God
2006-12-26 17:18:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by 4 Shades of Blue 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
How very dualist of you!
There might be a third answer......
What if there is a divine designer who created life with the inherent capacity to change, to choose to change, and pass such changes on to its progeny?
Do you really think that dogs are not more related to wolves than they are to squids?
Do you really think that dogs are not more related to bears than they are to squids?
Do you really think that dogs are not more related to mountain lions than they are to squids?
Do you really think that dogs are not more related to cows than they are to squids?
If they are more related, what does 'related' mean to you?
To me it has to do with family connections, with inheritance of traits.....
2006-12-26 18:11:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by raxivar 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't beleive in evolotuion, or reincanation, partialy because im a christian and thats what i was brought up to believe, and partially because it seems like u said a myth.
.........although some peole see god, or jesus, or even a greater power persay as a myth, thats where faith comes in, only the people with the strongest faith survive
2006-12-26 17:14:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Im that girl! 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
BlackJaguar,
Do me a favour.
Pour yourself a nice beer and read a good sex mag.
Stop worrying about life, the universe and everything.
It'll manage on its own.
2006-12-26 17:13:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
well Ive asked a challenging question on here before
it went like this...if god is a myth, then why cant anyone create life from scratch?
lol you know what I got ? a load of atheists beating around the bush! lol seriously now...if making babies was considered creating, why dont parents own the patent for each kid they make? hehehe
come now, its a fair request isnt it?
2006-12-26 17:14:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by Antares 6
·
0⤊
3⤋