English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which gun is better Crosman classic 2100 or the Remington Airmaster 77 and why? What makes the difference? Which one would you buy?

2006-12-26 07:53:33 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Outdoor Recreation Hunting

4 answers

I've had the AM77 for about 4 years now, and it is very accurate and powerful enough for cans and squirrels.

2006-12-26 20:24:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There basically the same rifle.
Both shoots bb's & pellets, both are multi pumpers, both have
fiber optic sights, both manufacturers say that they shoot 755fps
(which they don't, all manufacturers exaggerate what their guns
shoot, real life use with pellets is about 680-700 with light pellets)
Crosman makes their own guns, Remington is made by Daisy.
Because both shoots bb's both barrels aren't rifled (no grooves in
barrel, which makes them not very accurate)
Since you're asking which one would I buy, I would say neither.
But if you can spend a little more, I would suggest this one, It's a lot better than either one of those, and a lot more powerful and
much more accurate.

http://www.pyramydair.com/cgi-bin/model.pl?model_id=1011

but if you can't afford it, go with the Crosman.

2006-12-26 15:13:01 · answer #2 · answered by powerkyter 3 · 0 0

somewhat don't have lots to assert that hasnt already been reported. yet being an proprietor of one i could could say that they are tremendous weapons. For 70$ they cant be beat. So precise i take headshots and sparrows and squirrels at 20 yards and with capability to spare. Get the gun. good luck and good searching

2016-10-19 00:22:30 · answer #3 · answered by kigar 4 · 0 0

remington.

2006-12-26 19:45:58 · answer #4 · answered by shortstoperic7_2000 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers