Fighter Pilots off of aircraft carriers.?

Question

Does anyone know what the protocal is for a fighter pilot whose aircraft carrier has been destroyed and there is no landing space anywhere nearby? Are they just supposed to eject into the ocean and wait for a rescue ship?

Leogirl, I am a logical person but wasn't looking for the logical answer I was looking for the actual military protocol. Thanks for answering like a jerk, though.

Answer 1

Why? Have you lost your Carrier? LOL Just kidding. Where there is a carrier, there is a battle group. Destroyers, Battle ships, Subs, Frigets, etc, etc. They are not always in view of the carrier, but they are there. Usually within 10 - 30 miles of each other. If there is no where to land and there are no other aircraft with you, (which would be unusuall) then you would probably fly as long as you could looking for a place (which would be under instruction from the battle group command) and then eventually ditch your plane and wait for rescue from one of the other ships. There is also the option if refueling in flight. The Military has long range refueling planes that are usually in the air anytime there are sorties (flights) going on. You can fly a long time with these and we have bases all over the world, and more than one carrier which may be not to far away from the one you just lost. Happy flying :)

Answer 2

I believe that they have to burn enough fuel to be allowed to land. There is a tanker, should they bolter too many times. The idea is that if they were too crash on the deck, that there wouldn't be 100,000 pounds of fuel everwhere adding to it. If the carrier wasn't there, or was sunk, then a tanker from another location would be dispatched so that the aircraft could make a land base. Without the carrier or tanker, they would be forced to ditch almost immediately. One of the ships in the task force would then make the recovery.

Answer 3

maximum of our fixed wing airplane are unquestionably AF or ANG. From a service, as has been reported, the army and marine officers/warrant officers are the pilots. the maintenance is complete by employing military workers The AF forward deploys sources in a manner that the army can not. in addition to, the AF employs airplane for missions that the army has no forte or pastime in. In iraq for northern and southern watch, the AF performed a pivitol place in securing and directing the no-fly zones in iraq. in addition to, the airforce has MANY forward bases in the region which, coupled with refueling ability enable the air rigidity to strike any region of the worldwide. as to if or no longer the AF could be rolled into the army, that is 3 steps backwards in the developement of the protection rigidity. the concentration of naval airpower is first for fleet protection and 2d for air power projection. The AF concentration is on setting up dynamic air and area superiority, strategic bombardment, precision worldwide strike ability and a secondary concentration in air to floor wrestle help. This difference in concentration can grant the AF with unique applications that the army ought to in no way tackle... till you could coach me a C-5, C-17, B-2, B-1B or B-fifty two that could land on an airplane service. ultimately, the AF is the main ideal rigidity in the our online worldwide warfare area, and could grant different applications some distance previous universal airframe/payload transport. All of those complicated missions could take a protracted time to effectively pass between branches of service.

Answer 4

Yes and no. They will make every effort to get to dry land or to another carrier. Failing that they will get as close to a friendly ship as possible before bailing out.

Answer 5

Let's look at this logically, what do you think their options are at that point? That should give you your answer.