How much do u agree with 'the DaVinci code'?

Answer 1

Its all lie. there is nothing true with it

Answer 2

I dont think anyone could really agree with the ideas put forth in The DaVinci Code, as my someone said above, it's a work of fiction. Yes, there are some loosely historical facts contained but the veracity of these claims could widely swing from either truth to overexaggeration very easily.

I totally enjoyed the book though, and it's great to be able think that some of the things contained within are in fact the truth, but I think there is just as much evidence for the Bible itself to be total balderdash as well so I don't really know what to be believe :)

Answer 3

It is fiction sprinkled with historical facts. Opus Dei exists, The Knights Templar existed, The Priory Of Sion is a group created in the 1950's, people have been searching for the and speculating what and where the "Holy Grail" is. It is a masterful story, well written and sounds believable until you actually take the time to do the research yourself and see that most of the Da' Vinci code does not stand up under scrutiny.

Answer 4

I'm not quite certain what you mean by "agree with the DaVinci code." "The DaVinci Code" is a work of fiction. I don't know that there is anything about it with which to agree or disagree.

Answer 5

I'm no Bible thumper, but the DaVinci Code was a book - a peice of fiction (good fiction too). Dan Brown makes money selling books and the more contraversal, the better for him. There was a lot of crap in his book - by crap I mean what he calls facts are actually based on other authors books that are pure conjecture.

Answer 6

I believe

there is a place called Paris, France and one called London, England (have been to both).

there was a painter named Leonardo DaVinci (seen his work)

there is a Catholic organization called Opus Dei (have meet priests from there)


After that. . . I don't believe much of it (though it was a fairly well written book and a half-way descent movie - both held my attention for a while.)

Answer 7

I agree it was a decent read, with a clever plot. If Jesus actually existed, it is an interesting speculation on what happened after the events of the bible.

I agree it was badly written. Dan Brown is a bit of a hack writer and is terrible with character development and dialogue. He got lucky with that one, and made a fortune.

I agree he largely stole his plot device, though the courts didn't

I agree, that like the bible, it is entirely a work of fiction, for entertainment purposes only. I really don't understand why people get so worked up over fiction.

Answer 8

I think it's an interesting concept. Made a good movie (along the lines of National Treasure IMO) But I don't think it's factual. But the guy had a good point. Jesus still could have done all the wonderful things he did and actually had a life

Answer 9

I don't believe Jesus or his followers existed in the manner described by the Bible. So, the simple fact of describing Jesus makes the DaVinci code silly to me. However, if there were a Jesus, it would be unlikely that he did not marry. So, in that way, the DaVinci code is probably accurate.

Answer 10

What do you mean AGREE? It is a novel. What is there to agree or disagree with? Though it did get me thinking about the role of women throughout religious history... And I think what he did to the Op. Dei was uncool. He showed an extreme, bad light.

Answer 11

There is some truth to it.The Louvre is in Paris and London is in England. The rest of it may be kept until Spring, and spread on the ground to help the flowers grow.