http://www.yahoo.com/s/468530
Hey, if Saddam is to hang, what do you think will happen to Bush when WE finally catch up to him?
I cannot wait to see Bush on trial and when we do, it will be for MASS MURDEROUS TREASON, not to mention war crimes, fraud, and whatever else he's committed. My God, his trial is so complex we may just want to forego it all and use the infamous Bush Military Tribunal thing.
What are your thoughts? And if you disagree, just skip this one. I want to get intelligent responses.
2006-12-26 05:14:44 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Okay lets forget about, the illegal wiretapping , the rampant fraud, and the imprisoning of American citizens and taking away their rights guaranteed by the Constitution Bush should go to prison just based on the fact that he LIED, yes LIED to get us involved in the most disastrous foreign policy move in American history. Those lies have led to the deaths of hundred of thousands of people, tarnished America's image abroad and cost us billions of dollars based just on that he should be imprisoned. While execution would be due, their is not much chance of that but based on his actions he would deserve that fate.
2006-12-26 05:29:32 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
i'm grateful that George Bush is attempting to end international terrorism via merchandising freedom against center East dictatorships. "Iraq is messier than till now" ... Messy? because of the fact human beings get killed in the line now, whilst Saddam killed human beings in the back of closed doors? Absolute nonsense. Freedom is messy. a brilliant form of sturdy issues are messy. Please. "the place's Osama Bin weighted down?" ... We never have been given Hitler, the two, wager we did no longer attempt very no longer uncomplicated in international war 2. Osama is in all threat in Pakistan. What do you desire to do approximately it? Invade Pakistan? no longer chuffed with the extensive form of Al Qaeda terrorists and masterminds we've positioned out of fee? Or are you certainly one of those people who basically complains each and all the time. "the Sunni 0.5 of the insurgency will flow absolutelty ballistic" ... And who's gonna win the super Bowl in 2007? Or are you asserting "war isn't uncomplicated, so we could constantly no longer attempt"? How approximately asserting "i desire my us of a to win, that is reason is basically"? Your us of a is at war. Please help your us of a.
2016-10-28 09:53:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alright, so we should hang a man (The President) who has little say in the War; the way he talks sometimes you would think he does but the fact is, he cant declare war and its not up to him if we stay or leave. People like you dont even know the real reasons why we invaded or that the UN and Congress pushed America to invade, not Bush.
So you want to hang Bush for something he had little part in, and even if it was all him, he wouldnt deserve to be hung let alone any jail time. At the same time lets hang you for endorcing sweat shops and child labor for buying that Asian made shirt your wearing right now. Saying that has the same logic as what your saying should happen to GWB.
2006-12-26 05:28:01 · answer #3 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 3⤊ 4⤋
God help us! I see MD following your name. If this question is penned by a supposedly highly educated individual, what does that say about our educational system in this country? I won't skip this question but neither will I respond. The question isn't worthy of a response!
2006-12-26 05:41:37 · answer #4 · answered by Leonard B 1 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Who exactly is "WE"? I would like to know just in case I happen to report to the FBI your plot to assassinate Bush. By the way, should I tell them your real name is indeed Dr. William Fine, MD? :-)
2006-12-26 07:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by Joe L 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good luck getting any intelligent responses that are in agreement with you. Anyone who think Bush and Saddam are the same kind of person is flat out retarded and giving Bush way too much credit.
Saddam did what he did to benefit no one but himself, he had no concern for his people what so ever. Bush on the other hand made very poor decisions, but really believed he had the best interest of his people in mind.
Also, Saddam actually ordered the deaths of all the people he was convicted of murdering, Bush ordered no killings.
If you want to hate on Bush that is fine, I am right there with you, but stupid statements like this make it that much easier for the people in charge to discredit our beliefs as foolish and poorly thought out.
If you want intelligent answers, ask intelligent questions!
2006-12-26 05:22:16 · answer #6 · answered by answerman 4 · 6⤊ 5⤋
Yes I am looking forward to GW Bush being held responsible for the murderous attacks on 9/11
But will we find an honest judge or jury in America who will look at the evidence?
2006-12-26 05:53:57 · answer #7 · answered by lovefights 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Catch up with him? Is he running?
You post is assinine, but I think you know that. You ask for intelligent responses but you are not looking for an intelligent response, you are simply using you priveledge to post as a means to post your bias and hate.
You failed to mention ONE thing you are going to try him for and shown no proof that what you say is fact. Yet you have the nerve to use the word intelligent in you rant.
This is a laughable post.
2006-12-26 05:32:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
You want intelligent responses and yet you sound like an idiot. You can't have your cake and eat it to.
2006-12-26 06:53:16 · answer #9 · answered by Laura 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well dr ,I will NOT skip this, you may have an opinion as anyone else, but if you operate the way you spout off, and if you are a dr , I hope you have a lot of malpractice insurance as if you want only intelligent answers , please please ,DON"T listen to yourself,you will never get one
2006-12-26 05:32:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋