English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There are 76 books in the Clementine edition of the Latin Vulgate, 46 in the Old Testament, 27 in the New Testament, and 3 in the Apocrypha.
reference:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Books_of_the_Latin_Vulgate

2006-12-26 03:49:16 · 8 answers · asked by Sean 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

All down to Nicaea, really.

Still...I'm reading through some of these books now, with the links provided...and I really can't see why not. Nothing too crazy thus far, and a lot that is actually quite good. No more discard-worthy than Esther at least.

2006-12-26 03:59:49 · answer #1 · answered by angk 6 · 0 0

The Christians at Antioch had the original Scriptures. The sent a copy to the Eggheads at Alexandra. This was the center of all wisdom and learning. They read them and decided they need correcting. This was the scriptures Constantine used to write the first Catholic Bible which became known as the Latin Vulgate. The Antioch Scriptures were the original and they became know as the Texus Receptus, These were used to write the King James Bible. They rejected the Apocrypha as not having the "Signature" as the Texus Receptus did.

2006-12-26 04:00:31 · answer #2 · answered by djm749 6 · 1 0

the approach by employing which the Biblical Canon replaced into formed took incredibly a whilst and replaced into no longer extremely finalized till the late 4th and Early 5th Centuries. The Council of Hippo in 393 advert gave the canon that replaced into accompanied by employing the Latin West which they despatched to the "Transmarine Church" (i.e., Rome) for confirmation. Letters from the Popes in 401 and 405 affirmed this canon as did the watershed rfile from all the North African Councils ratified by employing the pope in 418 advert. The Latin Vulgate (inspite of Jerome's reticence concerning the Deuteros)replaced into printed @ 407 advert and used this same canonical record from Hippo in next variants. in simple terms before that factor, the main concepts-blowing content of the Bible replaced into in flux. The Gospel of John replaced into considered too gnostic in some circles in the 2d Century. there replaced into question approximately specific of the epistles attributed to St. Paul. Jude, 2&3 John, 2Peter, and Revelation have been additionally no longer gained everywhere before each and every thing. and a few books like 1Clement, The Shepherd of Hermas, and the Gospel of Peter have been esteemed in lots of church buildings. It extremely took centuries of discernment to boil all of it the way down to that record from Hippo.

2016-10-06 00:58:18 · answer #3 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

According to your link, there major difference is the pagination system, not the content.

2006-12-26 04:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 0 0

God has decided what He wants in His written Word for people to read.

2006-12-26 03:56:13 · answer #5 · answered by Born Again Christian 5 · 0 0

Curious ... Why do you have a photo of Mr.T to represent you? Did you know he is a christian and reads the bible?

2006-12-26 03:55:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don,t know

2006-12-26 03:52:44 · answer #7 · answered by arthur m 1 · 0 1

They were found to be SPURIOUS!

2006-12-26 03:54:38 · answer #8 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers