Can the Protestant/Fundamentalists name which books are missing from their King James version of their bible?

Question

....Bob is a great example of an ignorant Fundamentalist who knows just about Squat about Christian History....

They can't name the books, they are taught they no longer exist! LOL.

Answer 1

My, aren't we on a crusade (pun intended) today?

Although you belittle Chef Bob, he is correct.

And frankly, many Protestants don't even use the King James Bible. There are many other modern translations that are available, and don't use the Shakespearean English of the King James.

As to canonicity, the Apocryphal works have been excluded from Protestant Bibles for a reason. They are not inspired Scripture, and some even conflict with inspired Scripture.

And just so you don't think that all of us Prods are too ignert for the Romans, I'll even list the ones "missing."

1 Esdras
2 Esdras
Tobit
Judith
Additions to Esther
Wisdom of Solomon
Ecclesiasticus
Baruch
Epistle of Jeremiah
Song of the Three Children
Story of Susanna
Bel and the Dragon
Prayer of Manasseh
1 Maccabees
2 Maccabees

Now, let me turn the tables on you a bit:

Why doesn't the Roman church allow the "missing" Scriptures in their Bible? Yes! You too have omitted Apocryphal works as well! The Greek Orthodox (and the Protestants that use the Apocrypha) have some works in their Bibles that you don't have!

The Protestants use 1 Esdras and 2 Esdras, you don't. The Greeks use 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, and Psalm 151, that you don't.

Come to think of it, there is a Scripture where Jesus mentioned something about this....

"Why do you see the speck in your brother's eye but fail to notice the beam in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when the beam is in your own eye?" (Matthew 7:3-4 from the International Standard Version, not King James.)

Answer 2

Do you mean to signify that any repetition of Isaiah is plagiarism? Like while the Christians used Jewish scripture it somewhat is plagiarism? Or while Christ quoted Isaiah it replaced into plagiarism? Scriptures available to Smith have been written interior the previous English form; as a result the e book of Mormon replaced into written in that form besides. however there are an excellent quantities of editions interior the Isaiah of the e book of Mormon and KJV bible; those editions may be in comparison with the quite a few manuscript editions with the quite a few previous manuscripts we've that did no longer exist interior the 1820's and show one appealing actuality: Out of the places wherein the KJV and BoM disagree; there are greater places wherein the Bom is of an identical opinion with the different manuscript than the KJV. on an identical time as neither agree one hundred%, the BoM has a shown and specific lead over the KJV in terms of accuracy in step with available information.

Answer 3

I believe these are the names you are looking for.

Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Machabees, Abdias, Jonas, Canticles, Sophonias, 1 & 2 Paralipomenon.

Might have missed some. These are the Catholic books, not the Protestants.

Answer 4

Are you talking about the ones that never made it to the authorized version? The ones that take a more female-oriented view. I have no idea what they are called either. Doesn't mean I'm not a Protestant and certainly that I am not a Christian.

Answer 5

I'm CAtholic, but I know the Protestant bible has the book of Tobias missing. I remember this because the son of a Methodist minster and I were talking one day, and I said that I've always loved the book of Tobias. He said, "It's not in my bible so it doesn't exist"

Answer 6

The KJV found the books of the apocrypha not of signature and took them out.

Answer 7

there are NONE missing.
The Bible is God's complete work!