The question is just for fun and expanding one's horizons by taking a look at other people's thoughts. No offence intended at all.
Each answer according to his/her job please.
-What jobs/task each of the two will take?
-What attitude each will have towards bosses /colleagues
-Which is going to be your friend, and hwo could win your heart as a lover?
-Which would you like to team with and wich would you be afraid to compete against and why?
-Which of them your boss would like more, and why?
-Which of them have a better chance in suceeding in your career?
(feel free to add any other comments/situations/suggestions-in case you feel the question offends you feel free to ignore it!)
2006-12-25 15:35:04 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Sorry...just a waste of time...hypothetical! PEACE!!!
2006-12-25 15:38:10 · answer #1 · answered by David H 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
science would take a maintainance position, while religion would do manual labor, and probably the lowest job in the place. Religion would be alloof and reclusive, while science would be happy to explain anything he did. They would both be my friend, neither my lover. I would team with both of them, and compete against both, but science I would lern more from to make my own job easier, whereas religion would be there for me to vent my frustrations to. My boss would like religion more, because science would make him feel stupid and out of the loop. Science would have a better chance of succeeding, but would stay in it's current comfortable position forever--as it has done in real life for the past three or four decades
2006-12-25 15:46:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science would be a diligent worker, while Religion schmoozed around the office, gossiping and played office politics. Religion would badmouth Science to the boss and other coworkers. But when Science produced something good, Religion would step in and take credit for Science's work.
2006-12-25 15:48:36 · answer #3 · answered by February Rain 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
religion would be in charge of quality control - because they like to make rules.
science would be in charge of research and development - because they want to know the why of everything.
religion will like the people who follow rules.
science will like the ones who challenge the rules.
i would have them both as friends, but they probably wouldn't like each other. i wouldn't take either as a lover, because i'm already having an affair with pagan.
i would have both on my team - because they would bring different things. i wouldn't be afraid to compete against either one.
the boss would probably like religion more, because they would say what he/she would want to hear.
interesting question.
2006-12-25 16:00:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a thumbs down Q but I did not rate that. A question is usually singular. the web is a fast place some people have dial-up some 'puters are slow. Give ur brain and their hardware a break.rearrange ur syntax and have some Tack.
2006-12-25 15:45:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honesty vs fact that is the best question i've seen this whole year
i wouldn't sell as much in religion mode because i would be honest, where as factually i could sell as conditions to buy it is then up to the consumer to make an informed decision where as religiously i'd never make money because i wouldn't want anything back as factually i'm looking at gross profits in my career. facts are sales tools some people twist to make sales though. to me they're equal that's what i bring to the table in all aspects of my life....honesty & facts religiously
2006-12-25 16:03:05 · answer #6 · answered by MRS.HOTWHEELS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a million. technology may be the inventor and innovator at the same time as faith may be the sales rigidity, killing all people who have been given interior the way of the product. faith is ruthless to opposition and as quickly as a shopper is offered they are oftentimes very unswerving. 2. technology could be very extreme of the boss thinking their judgements and at the same time as faith could save on with orders blindly, on faith on my own in case you like or out of worry of being fired, understanding that the only selection is to paintings interior the fiery pits of McDonald's for eternity. 3. i could be pals with technology and fans with technology no longer because of the fact this is extra beautiful or something yet because of the fact faith is insanely jealous and illiberal. 4. lower back i could persist with technology as my teammate, i could be assured of getting to the terrific suited answer. faith could be continuously changing its techniques. satirically i could be afraid to compete against faith, they could in all probability pass one some murderous campaign as quickly as faith and that i beat them. 5. The boss could like faith in my view simply by their consistent *** kissing each and every Sunday yet could get extra suitable outcomes from technology. 6. technology, faith is basically no longer logical. perhaps if i grew to become into an precis artist or a toddler-kisser then faith could win. i'm hoping I replied all your questions and that i'm hoping I a minimum of offended one individual and with good fortune 2 or extra.
2016-11-23 17:19:44 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Religion without science is blind; science without religion is lame". So if they didn't cooperate with one another they would be discharged as handicapped people and end up on welfare where they wouldn't be able to function much.
2006-12-25 18:17:05 · answer #8 · answered by Mad Mac 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
One would try to beat the other to death with a stick in the name of God, while the other develops a handgun to defend himself.
2006-12-25 15:38:13 · answer #9 · answered by acgsk 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
both of them my best friends.
2006-12-25 15:41:46 · answer #10 · answered by yamanni 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋