FACTS: The fire cannot melt the steel but only weaken it. how do you explain the building falling at "Free Fall" speed? Learn some physics.If the building fell because of the fire, each level that of the building falling would slow the velocity. This is just some obvious stuff....DO YOU HAVE A COMMON SENSE?http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Atfsd8QxMq4Yle8yWIgVCmDsy6IX?qid=20061224195414AAaFdBU.
2006-12-25 14:40:29 · 22 answers · asked by OoOoOoOo 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
It was kids playing with matches.
Duh!
2006-12-25 14:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
PLEASE READ TO THE END... THERE'S A PUNCHLINE...
Bush conferenced with Osama and said
"Hey, Can you hook me up with something, I need a reason to invade Iraq and take Saddam and have more oil, at the same time whatever you do will draw all the attention away for my illogical reasoning for the invasion even after I tell the U.N. to go screw themselves and do it anyway. Lastly when I do invade Iraq all the focus will be off of you and you can go sprout some more Taliban in Syria and Iran. By the time everyone will catch on, I'll be out of office, a Democratic party will take the House and Senate and the next President will be Condoleeza Rice. Now that'll throw off everyone... an African American female President... she'll take care of the rest then."
The morale of the story... no one cares how the towers went down, we just wanna jack up whatever country made it happen!
2006-12-26 03:05:16 · answer #2 · answered by Patrick Y 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
the fire weakened the steel enough to collapse, and with every level that collapsed the weight of the blow on the still standing levels got bigger.that's why the speed increased and not decreased. its really very simple it you got common sense like all those who answered your question.
2006-12-26 02:27:21 · answer #3 · answered by tankbuff, 19 violations so far 4 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I have common sense, but you don't. What happened, you ask? A rich ex-Saudi who joined the Afghan Mujahadeen in the 1980's formed a whole different terrorist group dedicated to Global Fundamental Sunni Islam. Knowing that we wouldn't like this, he declared us our enemies, and in 2001, hired 19 of his goons to hijack some jumbo jets and crash them into the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and Capitol Building. Now here's how that traitorous prick Dylan Avery made his stupid conspiracy theory propaganda:
http://www.pointlesswasteoftime.com/911truth.html
2006-12-26 00:03:00 · answer #4 · answered by ddey65 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I do have common sense. That is why I believe the truth. That the planes hit the towers, as we have all seen, and that caused the buildings to collapse. I mean, this is just obvious stuff. Do you have any common sense?
2006-12-25 23:16:52 · answer #5 · answered by bumpocooper 5 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Having seen JP-4 burn in refinery fires, I can tell you that the white kerosene burns way hot and is oily enough to flood more than one floor. The building design contributed to it too. The others are right. Its accepted, what happened. Digging up bones is for dogs.
2006-12-25 22:54:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
You can't just say something is a fact and expect people to believe. But here is a fact for you, you are wrong. If you actually research this with an open mind you will realize how wrong you are.
http://www.lolloosechange.co.nr/
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Myths-Conspiracy-Theories/dp/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1167105408/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-5389440-7999849?ie=UTF8&s=books
2006-12-25 22:57:32 · answer #7 · answered by Curt 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
The steel weakened enough for the concrete slabs to begin collapsing. As the slabs stack up, the weight would be greater, thus the speed would be compensated for. You need to go back to the books yourself. Do you have any common sense?
2006-12-25 22:47:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
Oh man, "loose change", links again. Along with "letsroll911.org" and '911 in plane sight". I looked at them all, willing to hear what they had to say.
MY CONCLUSIONS:
It truly was amazing how these "demolitions" were pre-placed just at where the impacts were from the planes.
And if those planes were "remote pilot drones" where are the real flights 175, 11, 77, and 93? Not to mention the passengers.
And "I don't know" doesn't cut it.
2006-12-25 23:35:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
Gee, I wonder if you have any concept of what "free fall" really is?
Stop reading the conspiracy theory BS, and start using your head for something more than a hat rack.
2006-12-26 10:16:55 · answer #10 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It wasn't the Government, I am telling you it was the Evil Radioactive monkeys that are secretly running the world!!!
Once I get my web site up with its unsubstantiated and unprovable facts you will know the threat as well....
2006-12-26 04:02:53 · answer #11 · answered by Stone K 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋